Measuring/evaluating e-Government is a contemporary research agenda. Is there a link between measuring e-Government success and e-Government sustainability?
Sustainability of e-administration is determined primarily by the level of cybersecurity and the stability of the operation of IT and Internet e-administration systems. The analysis of the development of cybersecurity systems of online banking systems can be helpful in this matter, because many digital security standards used in online e-government systems were previously created by IT specialists operating in online banks. Therefore, the cybercrime risk management standards developed as part of the development of internet banking can be used to analyze the operation and improve cybersecurity, operational stability and sustainability of e-administration systems. As in the current situation of the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) coronavirus pandemic, the importance of e-administration development is growing, so is the importance of improving cybercrime risk management systems and improving the operation of cybersecurity systems, operational stability and sustainability of e-administration systems.
In evaluation, sustainability usually refers to the likelihood that the net benefits from an intervention will last (or are likely to continue). Success typically refers to the achievement of an outcome whereby an intervention has generated (or is expected to generate) a significant positive and intended, higher-level effect. It follows that what linkages there might be between e-government "success" and e-government "sustainability" depend on the significance of an intervention's achievement along a results chain. In other words, accomplishing an output or, better, an outcome is not the same as delivering an impact. To wit, along a results chain, the success and sustainability of e-government will be conditioned by the location of achievements along such progressively demanding stages of development as (a) presenting; (b) assimilating; (c) reforming; (d) morphing; and (e) e-governance. The higher up the results chain, the better.
Вопрос интересный. Но , я как специалист по растениеводству связь между электроники и урожая вижу в программирование урожайности и математической моделирование сельского хозяйства