To Moshe Ofer,

Thank you for sharing this items.

Kind regardas

Kindly check

A Philosophical Evaluation of the Chaos Theory "Revolution" - jstor

https://www.jstor.org/stable/192823

hy is Chaos Theory Important? Third revolution: a quantum leap. At about the same time (and what a time!) a third revolution took place in scientific thought with Heisenberg ...

https://brunomarion.com/why-chaos-theory-is-important-for-you/

Dear Dragoljub,

I would still count the revolutions in time, and not in the form of science. The first revolution is the creation of the foundations of classical mechanics. It is associated primarily with the names of Galileo and Newton. If you don’t consider the discovery of electromagnetism as a revolution, despite the fact that this discovery is associated with such titans of science as Faraday and Maxwell and colossal consequences for the progress of mankind, then the discovery of quanta and quantum mechanics can be considered as the second revolution. I would also include the discovery of the theory of relativity (special and general) in this second scientific revolution, since it happened at the same time as the discovery of quantum mechanics. The pioneers here were, as you know, Planck, Einstein, Bohr, Heisenberg and Schrödinger. It is noteworthy that when we talk about the scientific revolution, we are actually talking about a revolution in physics.

Now, regarding your question about chaos theory, can it be a new, third scientific revolution. I think not, at least if we bear in mind your formulation of the question. The types of chaos are very diverse, and there is no universal theory of chaos. Namely, the status of universality is a hallmark of both classical mechanics and quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity. On the other hand, "chaos theory" is considered, as you rightly noted, in various spheres of human activity, and not only in physics. It is this circumstance that deprives "chaos theory" of the property that a fundamental, and certainly physical, theory should possess. It is not physics that I bring to the fore because I am a physicist myself. It is just that while humanity does not have another fundamental (read, sufficiently accurate) means for scientific research of the surrounding world, including itself. It is likely that this will always be so as long as humanity exists. I repeat that the scientific revolution was and is a revolution in physics. (I can imagine how unfriendly these words of mine can be perceived, for example, by geneticists!) It is the successes of physics that underlie the technological progress of mankind. The advances in chemistry, biology, genetics, and the "social sciences" are ultimately the result of advances in physics.

As you can see, strategically, it makes sense to talk only about physics. The rest of the sciences "can wait". In physics, chaos is also very diverse. There is, for example, such a thing as "quantum chaos". But here you need to understand one and very important thing about physics. Physics has always dealt with inanimate matter. I do not mean that the methods of physics are not applied in practice to living objects (for example, there is such a science as biophysics), but that in the very foundations of physics (in classical and quantum mechanics) there is no element of self-organization of matter. The discovery of just such an element of self-organization in physics, which would make it possible to give a universal explanation of the origin and evolution of living matter, could be considered the third revolution in physics and, accordingly, in all of science. It is clear from general physical considerations that this element of self-organization must be inextricably linked with some type of chaos. It is possible that this role may be claimed by dozy chaos.

Best regards,

VVE

Thank you Mr.Chinaza Godswill Awuchi for sharing these items.

Kind regards.

Dear Vladimir,

I agree with you: It is the successes of physics that underlie the technological progress of mankind. The advances in chemistry, biology, genetics, and the "social sciences" are ultimately the result of advances in physics. Your answer is very useful and instructive for me and my attempts that through TQM(Total Quality Management) philosophy (or strategy, concept,..., which composed of values, tools and technics), to connect the mechanistic paradigm (the Newton paradigm) with the complexity paradigm.The goal is to prepare the organisation to absorb various disorders(especially crisis) as much as possible, and to continue to function, i.e. not to disintegrate, as is now often the case. As you said the concept of self-organization is of the utmost importance in those efforts.

Kind regards,

DŠ

In my opinion Chaos has a predetermined pattern. However, from our perspective it is impossible to determine the next step in the pattern. For example if the pattern follows prime numbers then the next number at any point in a series of natural numbers greater than 1 is predetermined - a prime number / or a composite number but we cannot know it.

So our universe is a deterministic system but from our point of view it is non deterministic.

This idea has great impact as it means that even though our universe is deterministic from our point of view it is non deterministic which means we do have free will and free thinking in a fully deterministic universe. This means that we are the “Chaos” agent.

Please see my first presentation in the series: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gnGQLJa6SxpCon-tLbpo-2wbaYj-en4R/view?ts=5de3c0ad

Thank you Mr.Moshe Ofer for sharing this item.

I am not an expert on this subject, therefore I have no answer to the question.

Still, I tend to refrain to call advancement in science "scientific revolutions" and therefore I cannot number them.

Having said so, I welcome veiwpoint exchanges across academic disciplines and therefore I thank you for having raised the subject

Thank you for sharing a absolutely new concept for me. Was going through the answers. Though not an issue of medical science but still felt fascinated by gaining knowledge on a new event.

I agree with Gabriele, So No, I don't think so, And I also think that all science except biomedicine has had no major advances.

To Mrs Gabriele Scheler and Mr.Ali Alwaeli ,

I respect your opinion. Different opinions about the same things are extremely important because we learn from them. In line with that I want to say some core mentions.

1.One of definitions of life is: Life is a struggle between entropy and negentropy. ''Negentropy''(''negative entropy'') is notion which introduced in biology

for quantity which characterises ability of system to perform work.

2.Unavoidable entropy of living system, decreasing its free life energy and working ability (ageing) force living system updates structures of proteins.

3.There is direct connection between entropy in physics and entropy in biology.

4. Metabolism of living cell is defined by pressure, temperature an number of mole.

In living systems are happened physics-chemical processes, which are in core irreversible so thermodynamics method of nonequilibrium states can be applied to them.

5.There is descriptions of living systems which is independent from biochemistry on the Earth. Such method exist in the frame of one fundamental logical principle, in line with which it absolutely all living systems are operated, using some simply known terms and physical laws.

Biochemistry as we know on the Earth, emergents from that fundamental principle and so that represents only one possibility its realisation(DNK life).

6. Thanking for mechanism of deliver of excess inner entropy of living systems they last far from state of thermodynamics equilibrium.

7. Erwin Schrödinger: Struggle of living beings for survival.... is struggle for negative entropy.

8. Metabolism is synonym for release of excess inner entropy...etc...etc

9.In line with above I agree that: The advances in chemistry, biology, genetics, and the "social sciences" are ultimately the result of advances in physics.

In my opinion Chaos has a predetermined pattern. However, from our perspective it is impossible to determine the next step in the pattern. For example if the pattern follows prime numbers then the next number at any point in a series of natural numbers greater than 1 is predetermined - a prime number / or a composite number but we cannot know it. So our universe is a deterministic system but from our point of view it is non deterministic. This idea has great impact as it means that even though our universe is deterministic from our point of view it is non deterministic which means we do have free will and free thinking in a fully deterministic universe. This means that we are the “Chaos” agent. Chaos – imperative to life and created by life

My presentation The Universe life explains my view however, it relies as the basis on the presentation The Universe.