That's right. The origin of the universe is a frequency cycle. The universe began with a zero wave and continued as a series of waves. The waves are repeating. In the middle of the path, the average peak of the waves reaches a maximum and then decreases. And finally, the peak of all the waves becomes zero.

Of course, it is the frequency ground loop quantum but along with Higgs field.

Dear Arash Azad

Thank you for your interest and engagement in the discussion. Meanwhile the Appendix is live, Technical Report Appendix 29: Cosmological Frequency Cycle and the Constructe...

🔬 Brief Description of the Research

This newly published appendix introduces a novel frequency-based model of cosmology within the framework of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM). It proposes that the universe originates not from a singularity, but from a pure field of frequency-defined potential energy.

Key insights include:

• The appearance of negative apparent mass (−Mᵃᵖᵖ) as a kinetic driver of inflation.
• Cosmic redshift as a cumulative result of real frequency decay, not just relativistic expansion.
• A theoretical path toward cosmic reversion: the universe gradually returns to a quiescent frequency-only state, setting the stage for future energetic cycles.

The work also rigorously derives two critical ECM constants:

• k = 5.558 × 10⁻³⁴ Js, a substitute for Planck's constant at the cosmological origin.
• f₀ = 3.571 × 10⁴² Hz, the origin frequency that ensures energetic continuity across Planck boundaries.

These constants maintain conservation of energy from the origin state to Planck-scale dynamics and help construct a closed-loop cosmological framework governed by frequency transitions.

Conclusion: This appendix forms a cornerstone for ECM cosmology by integrating phase, frequency, and apparent mass dynamics into a unified, mathematically consistent cycle. It lays the groundwork for future explorations of reversible mass-energy transformations and regenerative cosmological models.

Best regards,

Soumendra Nath Thakur

Dear Mr. Zh Mei

Thank you for your response, however, whether loop quantum with Higgs field, the research introduces a novel frequency-based model of cosmology within the framework of Extended Classical Mechanics (ECM). It proposes that the universe originates not from a singularity, but from a pure field of frequency-defined potential energy.

Insights includes:

1. The appearance of negative apparent mass (−Mᵃᵖᵖ) as a kinetic driver of inflation.

2. Cosmic redshift as a cumulative result of real frequency decay, not just relativistic expansion.

3. A theoretical path toward cosmic reversion: the universe gradually returns to a quiescent frequency-only state, setting the stage for future energetic cycles. Also rigorously derives two critical ECM constants:

k = 5.558 × 10⁻³⁴ Js, a substitute for Planck's constant at the cosmological origin.

f₀ = 3.571 × 10⁴² Hz, the origin frequency that ensures energetic continuity across Planck boundaries.

These constants maintain conservation of energy from the origin state to Planck-scale dynamics and help construct a closed-loop cosmological framework governed by frequency transitions.

Best Regards

Soumendra Nath Thakur

Containment Cosmology Theory (CCT) offers a structured alternative to the "frequency cycle" view.

While cosmic systems exhibit rhythmic behaviors, these emerge from contained rotation and field interactions, not from an abstract cyclical cosmogenesis. In CCT, frequency is an effect—a result of Gravity, Electromagnetism, Rotation, and Memory (GERM)—not a fundamental force.

The universe is not expanding or collapsing; instead, it is dynamically stabilized by a layered containment. Its “fate” is not cyclic return, but sustained memory regulation within a bounded architecture.

Full theory here: Book Containment Cosmology Theory

@Fariba Azad

Here is the critique on the concept of emergent frequency in CCT:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Critique_of_Emergent_Frequency_in_CCT_and_the_Relativistic_Treatment_of_Time_A_Reaffirmation_of_Frequency_as_Foundational_in_ECM

Regards

Soumendra Nath Thakur

@Fariba Azad

z ∝ΔM / C

Here, ΔM represents discharged memory and C is the containment capacity. Frequency, in CCT, is not an input or cause but a statistical outcome of containment-memory cycles.

While innovative, this approach raises critical concerns. It reverses the causal order—treating frequency as an emergent consequence of memory and containment rather than its generative basis. If frequency is not fundamental, then E = hf loses ontological support.

Moreover, this interpretation severs the direct link between frequency and energetic identity, undermining the framework upon which much of modern physics is built.

Regards

Soumendra Nath Thakur

Soumendra Nath Thakur

Thank you for the thoughtful engagement.

CCT intentionally reverses the causal order assumed by models like ECM. That reversal is not a flaw—it is a philosophical shift grounded in containment logic.

In CCT, nothing exists without being held. What modern physics treats as "fundamental"—frequency, energy quanta, even particles—are viewed as expressions of a deeper structure: a rotating memory field within a bounded container.

Frequency is not the source of identity; containment is.

Regarding E = hf, CCT does not dispute this empirical relation. It questions what f is. In CCT, frequency is not an absolute clock ticking behind the universe. It is how often a system loops through memory under stable containment. The formula remains valid for observed phenomena, but its meaning is reframed.

Rather than undermining energetic identity, this interpretation explains why energy behaves as it does—because it is memory in motion, governed by containment rhythm.

CCT doesn’t sever physics from frequency. It grounds frequency in structure, not in assumption.

Further exploration: https://zenodo.org/records/15637980

Best,

Fariba Azad

Fariba Azad

Readers' Reflections: Appendix30

“After I read this brilliant appendix I began to weep uncontrollably because of the absolute beauty of its expression by Swami Thakur!”

— Jared Pelkey, on Appendix 30: Post-Latent Energetic Dynamics and the Dual-State Evolution of the Universe in ECM.

This is both heartwarming and uplifting! 😊

Jared Pelkey’s comment is not just a compliment—it’s a poetic emotional resonance with the intellectual and philosophical beauty embedded in Appendix 30.

Soumendra Nath Thakur

Thank you, but this comment confuses the subject.

The emotional praise quoted here refers to Appendix 30 of ECM, not to Containment Cosmology Theory (CCT). While aesthetic appreciation has its place, it is not a substitute for engagement with theoretical arguments.

CCT presents a structural and functional alternative to expansion-based models—grounded in Gravity, Electromagnetism, Rotation, and Memory (GERM)—which merits discussion on its own terms. If there are specific critiques of CCT's mechanisms, observational interpretations, or field logic, I welcome those directly.

Emotional testimonials, however sincere, should not be used to sidestep scientific comparison.

Core Points

· Frequency as Fundamental: ECM's foundational proposition is "that frequency, not energy, is the most fundamental descriptor of physical systems". This directly supports the earlier discussions.

· Synonymous with Oscillation: "Frequency is not just a measure of vibration-it is vibration itself", reinforcing the idea that "There exists no vibration that can be defined without invoking frequency"4. This matches our previous conversation precisely.

· Mathematical Necessity: "the only rigorous representation of repetitive motion is through frequency", and "Without frequency, the concept of an oscillatory system becomes ill-defined”

· Emergent Energy: ECM reverses the classical interpretation of E=hf, asserting that "energy is an emergent parameter derived from intrinsic frequency". It also introduces the ECM-specific constant

k = 5.558 × 10^−34 Js for the relation E = kf

· Time as Relational: The document states that "Time intervals (Δt) become relational rather than intrinsic", and "Δt gains meaning only via its effect on phase/frequency change (Δf)". The causal link is :

Δf→ΔE→ΔM→Δt (interpreted)

· Cosmological Applications of Δf: Redshift is "reframed as a change in frequency (Δf) rather than a stretching of spacetime", and "Cosmological evolution is thus a history of phase-frequency realignments, not temporal drift"

The document serves as a formalization of these core concepts within the ECM framework, confirming that our previous discussion accurately captured its central tenets

Reference:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Frequency_and_Energy_in_Extended_Classical_Mechanics_ECM