Supreme being GOD is certainty & when we talk or in our prayer we pray to our GOD in order to receive the grace & the kingdom of GOD ,we should not become so to say a doubting Thomas.

God is within every human beings in the form of our SOUL which remains all the time with us & never disappear even after our last journey .

The question of existence of our GOD is to remain totally with us .If we do not have the faith & total surrounded in our prayer & worship we will not be in a position to establish the link between us & GOD to whom so ever you believe .

When we talk regarding the GOD as a biological being we are certainly considering  GOD has a human being in the human form & we should worship him as a human form .

The importance consideration between GOD & his biological form ,we are forgetting the basic fact that they are an incarnated in our human form & their basic end is to establish a total humanitarian forms to the entire human beings .

GOD comes as an incarnate in the form of human being to help ,guide ,& to show the path of divinity within every human being so that man can live happily ,& peacefully .

With this question ,after viewing the general atmosphere of our universal ,Are we not feeling the utmost necessity of GOD as an incarnated in human forms!!

No.

G-d is not physical.

Universe had a start. Per Standard Model and The Pearlman Spiral cosmology models.

Law of the conservation of matter: we do not get something from nothing.

Therefore G-d (the creator of the initial singularity ie all physical matter is supernatural .)

Abraham determined not only is G-d the designer and creator of the laws of nature (as Adam-Shem knew and already taught) but continues to manage and sustain creation.

Also Judaism and I assume Islam  this is a basic principle of faith/knowledge so the OP claim 'all major religions endorse this view'.is flawed.

Evaluable but not testable. 

Anirudh,

You appear to know the answer to the question you posed.

"Yes, of course. Supreme Being is a Biological Being."

Why therefore do you ask the question?

I am sorry James.  I have edited my answer. 

If it is a biological being...it would have an ego...this would lead to God being good or bad.....and I don't think we need good and bad God's.

A biological being ? From an etymologically  point of view : biological from BIO (life),  your question does not make sense, dear Anirudh.

Why you think in negative terms, Contzen.  It is the intention which may be bad or good.  god has no bad intention.  If we have cognitive abilities then why not God.  God is the source of everything.

God is the source of life, Manzo.

Almost every religion talks about meditation /one pointedness/concentrating while in prayers. In Hindu scriptures , both Nirakar (formless) and Sakar (form) have been mentioned. But Human mind finds it difficult to practice Nirakar (formless), i.e to focus on formless. I feel considering God as a Biological being Would help in practicing Sakar (form).

You are right Adesh.  But even formless is also biological since nothing is without life.

... yes, you are right ...

No, God isn't a biological being, assuming the Abrahamic monotheistic tradition. Since God is the cause of the universe (all time, space, matter, and energy), and the cause of space and matter must lie beyond space and matter, God is immaterial, not biological. Hence God is spirit, not body.

Thanks Dr. Kirk for a very nice response. What is biological? I think biological is both material and immaterial.

Well, Christianity seems to answer this in the affirmative. If Jesus is God as per the Holy Trinity, yet had a human body, was of woman born, grew from a baby into manhood, experienced hunger, ate food, etc., and then suffered and died, it sure sounds like he was a biological being for some finite portion of his existence. On the other hand, the Valentinians claimed that Jesus never had to defecate, so maybe his metabolism was more like Groot's than like a human's.

Apparently a very old tread but still ...

Anirudh, you say that you "think biological is both material and immaterial". I can tell you that you think wrong! Only living things can be biological. The rest, you decide for yourself.

BTW, don't bring God anywhere close to Biology because Biological principles were created to destroy the God hypothesis and are proving pretty good at it...

Dear Zerihun, Thanks for responding.

Biology simply means science of life. Even the tiniest particle has life. It partakes in life process.

We may substitute the word God by the word Creator. For me both has the same meaning

So many ideas there Anirudh but let's start with this: when you say that "Even the tiniest particle has life. It partakes in life process", you are equating partaking in life process with having life. Are they not different things?

Also you need to define what you mean by "tiniest particle".

Whatever exists, Dear Zerihun, is conscious and has life. The question 'God plays dice or not' is self explanatory