-Reality is (according to the established mainstream science) identical to all what is (see e.g. D. Bohm in his book Wholeness and the Implicate order).
-In 'all what is' is meant by him the system of {matter;space;time}; so only the 'what', not the 'who'.
-In other words, according to the established mainstream science: reality regards only {matter;space;time}, not human being.
-My question is: is this reasoning true and correct?
Thanks for your answer. Marc.
To Marc Carvallo:
concerning BEING=EXISTENCE
being
NOUN
- 1mass noun Existence. ‘the railway brought many towns into being’‘the single market came into being in 1993’More example sentences
- Synonyms existence, living, life, animation, animateness, aliveness, reality, actuality, essential nature, lifeblood, vital force, entity
- from Oxford Dictionaries
Dear Marc Carvallo, Thank you very much for making very important inquiries on the Research Gate portal and inspiring important discussions on particularly important issues.
In my opinion, it is good that there was a discussion in the question of this query.
This is a very interesting and scientifically important topic.
Because the topic is very important so I still read the answers, I follow the interesting discussion.
Question:
Is reality identical to being?
this is a very important issue that requires scientific research.
An interesting question that should be explored on the basis of philosophy.
I answer an interesting question:
An interesting question that should be explored on the basis of philosophy. For centuries, since ancient times, in the history of the development of philosophical thought, theories that explain the relationship between the reality that surrounds man and the human perception of the world in which he lives and shape consciousness referring to this reality have changed significantly.
I invite you to the discussion.
Being is equal to existence.
Everyone understands reality in accordance with upbringing, education, power of imagination, temperament, etc.
No, Leonid, being is not equal to exsistence!
Thanks anyhow for your answer! Marc.
Dear Dariusz,
For a discussion on this subjectmatter is a matter of course! First of all, you mention . My first question to you (and other readers): Is philosophy not the foundation of science?
Thanks for (all) your answers! Marc.
To Marc Carvallo:
concerning BEING=EXISTENCE
being
NOUN
- 1mass noun Existence. ‘the railway brought many towns into being’‘the single market came into being in 1993’More example sentences
- Synonyms existence, living, life, animation, animateness, aliveness, reality, actuality, essential nature, lifeblood, vital force, entity
- from Oxford Dictionaries
Dear Leonid,
Of all {matter;space;time}, including the Oxford dictionaries, the English language misses the substantivation of to be. Alas! Please try to translate Heidegger's Sein und Zeit in correct English. Again, being is not identical to exsistence!
Thanks anyway for your answer! Marc.
Dear Nirmala,
Your goes against the grain with me. Why? Because it refers to your as if human beings don't belong to reality! (Please read more carefully my concise description).
Thanks anyway for the added answer! Marc.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Books