01 January 1970 3 8K Report

ALL OVER THE WORLD INDIAN RESEARCHERS ARE INVITED TO PARTICIPATE, OTHERS EXPERTS MAY FOLLOW OF GIVE THIR PRECIOUS WORDS.

  • Let us start a discussion with words of Dr. James E. Fisher is a professor of Marketing at Saint Louis University....
  • He said that these are highly prestigious journals. A publication in either of these journals can cement a scientific reputation, advance academic rank and significantly boost one's status (and academics do crave status).

    These two journals are not tightly bound to any specific discipline like biochemistry or immunology and thus find a somewhat more general readership. For example, published research in Science or Nature is often picked up by the media and given considerable coverage and distribution. This, too, academics love.

    I imagine that the acceptance rate at both journals is below 10%. Most submissions are probably "desk rejected" (i.e., the editor will wisely decide not to waste a reviewer's time). If the article does have merit, it will go through a rigorous review process, which most articles will not withstand.

    The pecking order among high-status academic journals now is often gauged by a so-called impact factor, itself a measure of how frequently the journal articles get referenced or cited. Both Nature and Science have very big impact factors -- very close to the top of the heap. In this respect they are comparable to top medical journals like the The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet.

    More Kapil Bhatt's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions