It is true that Einstein didn't understand physics, because physics is the universal law of nature.
He didn't fully understand physics (universal law) and didn't distinguish it from what isn't. He used black magic (a thought experiment) to combine different incompatible theories and falsely derive his theories of special relativity and general relativity, which delayed the world for another 100 years.
1- In his theory of special relativity [1], he attempted to prove the Lorentz transformation without knowing that this transformation is a universal law without proof.
He then used the black magic of two concentric spheres of light with the same center and moving independently to achieve his false objective.
2- In his theory of general relativity, he once again used his black magic (thought experiment) to arrive at his incomprehensible stress-strain tensor.
G μ ν (nu)= 8 Pi G / C^4 . T μ ν
We propose a more correct and precise stress-curvature matrix/tensor.
∇2xx ∇2xy ∇2xz ∇2xt U(x,y,z,t)
∇2yx ∇2yy ∇2yz ∇2yt U(x,y,z,t)
∇2zx ∇2zy ∇2zz ∇ zt U(x,y,z,t)
∇2tx ∇2ty ∇ 2tz ∇2tt U(x,y,z,t)
x
Cxy Cxy Cxz Cxt
Cyx Cyy Cyz Cyt
Czx Czy Czz Czt
Ctx Cty Ctz Ctt
= I (unit matrix) . . . Equation 1
The first matrix is called the stress matrix.
Stress is not a force/area scalar (a single component).
Stress tensor has 16 components.
Stress in a 4D unit x-t space is composed of 16 components, called stress tensors B
The second matrix is called the deformation or curvature matrix/tensor C.
It's a great start.
Contrary to Einstein, stress or energy density, like gravity, causes space to curve, not the other way around.]
Once again, Einstein's fatal error was to invert Equation 1, a flawed process that asserts falsely that curvature creates gravity, not the other way around.
The matrix equation 1 proposed by the author is
capable of solving the following two problems:
1- Special Theory of Relativity.
2- General Theory of Relativity.
The author demonstrated that the two theories constitute a single theory.
Why two?
The first theory is simply a special case of the second, as it should be.
-----
1-I. Abbas,A rigorous reformulation of Einstein derivation of the special theory of relativity,
- February 2022,
Yes, in my perspective it is true that Einstein did not fully understand physics. Physics is the universal law of nature, not a set of abstract thought experiments. Einstein failed to distinguish between what belongs to universal law and what does not. Instead, he relied on what I describe as “black magic”, thought experiments that stitched together incompatible ideas. This created elegant illusions rather than true laws and delayed physics by about a century.
(1.) Special Relativity
Einstein tried to prove the Lorentz transformation, even though it already stands as a universal law that does not require proof. To reach his conclusion, he introduced the black magic of two concentric spheres of light moving independently, which was an artificial construct rather than a physical reality.
(2.) General Relativity
In his general theory of relativity, Einstein again relied on thought experiments and produced his stress-energy tensor. His fatal mistake was to invert the true relationship between stress and curvature. He claimed that curvature creates gravity, when in reality stress or energy density, like gravity itself causes space to curve.
My Perspective
Stress is not just a scalar but a full 4D tensor with 16 components. It interacts with curvature directly. This shows that special relativity is not a separate theory at all but simply a special case of the general framework, as it should be.
Conclusion
Einstein’s genius was in imagination, but he did not truly grasp physics as the universal law of nature. His theories of relativity were built on thought experiments that functioned like black magic, not on universal truths. A correct formulation places stress and energy density at the foundation, causing curvature rather than the other way around. This unifies what Einstein mistakenly divided into two separate theories.
Proving that Einstein was ignorant in most aspects of physics and that he was also a professional cheat is easier than you think.
Any undergraduate science student knows well that proving or attempting to prove a universal law of nature is a form of ignorance and cheating.
Juggler
The current theory of special relativity is a scandal and its author is something of an imposter.
1- In his theory of special relativity [1], he attempted to prove the Lorentz transformation law, a universal law of physics and therefore impossible to prove by any means whatsoever.
He thus demonstrated his ignorance of an important aspect of physics: the constancy or conservation of the unitary space x-t in four-dimensional motion.
Failing to apply rigorous science, he turned to his favorite field: the invention of false thoughts, which we call black magic.
This time, he invented or imagined two concentric spheres moving unrelated to each other, but which remained concentric (an incredible deception).
2- In his theory of general relativity, he again used the same deceptive trick to derive his stress-strain tensor, starting from the end, the curvature, and working his way back to the beginning.
From effect or result to cause, he leaves everyone speechless.
With
With our readers' permission, I would like to ask two questions about our exceptional teacher who taught us to love science and scientific facts:
1- How many science certificates did A. Einstein receive?
2- How many teaching positions did he hold, and at which universities?
The answer is: none.
------
1-1-I. Abbas,A rigorous reformulation of Einstein derivation of the special theory of relativity, February 2022.
I will acknowledge that Einstein wasnt perfect -- as a man, father, and as a scientist. But, I am not sure this question and discussion advances the cause of science, other than to promote division.
Dear Ismail,
Your critique is expressed in an emotional form and unfortunately lacks scientific ethics. In science we discuss ideas and results, not attack the personality of a scientist.
Ethics and facts are the foundation of any serious science.
An ignorant man from Turan, Kazakhstan, is giving lectures.
I adore A. Einstein and he remains my idol.
I am publishing A. Einstein's diploma and notes from 1896 below just to demonstrate that our man from Turan, Kazakhstan, is ignorant and spreading lies.
Dear Ismail,
Your own words contradict each other: first you call Einstein “ignorant” and accuse his theory of being “black magic,” and then you say that you “adore Einstein” and that he “remains your idol.” Such inconsistency only proves that your head does not agree with your pen — your emotions write one thing, while logic would demand the opposite.
This kind of confusion is not science. Serious discussion requires clarity, consistency, and respect for facts, not emotional swings and self-contradictions. Until you can align your reasoning with your words, your place in this debate is only as a reminder of how not to argue in physics.
Finally, last week, after 100 years, Google searches and Einstein's iron guards began to admit that his thinking (his thought experiments) was not based on rigorous mathematics, but on black magic :.
("Black Magic":
The term "black magic" appears to be a dismissive accusation made by a critic who believes that Einstein's theories, particularly his attempt to prove the Lorentz transformations, are not based on rigorous science, but rather on "the invention of false thoughts."
")
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Filing