The concept of global citizenship is complicated by the fact that countries have distinct laws governing citizenship. Some nations restrict individuals to single citizenship, while others permit multiple citizenships. True global citizenship would require countries to align their interests, yet each nation prioritizes its own agenda. States operate under diverse systems—capitalism, communism, Sharia law, and others—further complicating unity.

Global citizenship could only become a reality in a world without borders or militaries, where shared humanity transcends national divisions.

Is global citizenship possible?

Absolutely — creating a form of global citizenship is certainly possible. But that has never really been the core issue. The real questions are:

It’s very likely that emerging technologies will accelerate the path toward global citizenship — unless a major, unexpected event forces it to happen suddenly.

Looking at the world today, I find it hard to imagine global citizenship becoming a reality within the next 50 years. But I do believe we’ll get there eventually — once societal demands align and begin to truly call for it.

Right now, most societies aren’t asking for a shared global identity. They’re still asking for something more basic: the full and consistent respect of human rights. And unless that fundamental step is achieved, it will be difficult for societies to imagine — let alone embrace — something beyond it.

Wishing you a thoughtful and inspiring day!

“Is global citizenship possible?”

In many ways, global citizenship already exists—it's embodied in institutions like the United Nations (UN). The UN has established a foundational framework for shared values through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which outlines the basic rights and freedoms to which all people are entitled.

In my book, Global Civility—which emphasizes civility over globalism (a distinction worth noting)—I used the physical Constructal Law to explore a foundational prerequisite for meaningful global citizenship. It's not just about political structures, but about cultivating and expediting the evolution of civil capacity across cultures and nations.

I’ve included links below that offer further background aligned with your question.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356475384_THE_SCIENCE_OF_RIGHTS

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D5Z2SQBN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgEBTPee9ZM

القيود هي الضبظ الاداري وهي مسالة لها علاقةبالسيادة مدرجةفي الدستور و معترف بها في ميثاق الامم المتحدة

Global citizenship is now a radical idea, but one we need

Global Citizenship Education (GCED) emerged from post-World War II aspirations to build peace through education, drawing on international declarations such as UNESCO’s 1996 Delors Report and the 2000 Earth Charter. It envisioned education as a transformative force, cultivating critical consciousness, empathy and a sense of belonging to humanity.

GCED positioned learners not merely as national citizens, but as active participants in an interconnected world, capable of addressing complex global issues...

At that historical moment, GCED seemed not only timely but essential – a framework through which education could prepare individuals to engage with pressing global challenges, such as climate change, inequality and violent conflict, with a shared sense of purpose and responsibility...

Education became a new ideological battleground, with GCED increasingly portrayed as a threat to national identity and cultural autonomy. Critics questioned whether global citizenship promotes cultural homogenisation, erodes traditional values or imposes Western liberal norms – challenging GCED’s legitimacy in societies where public discourse is increasingly polarised and global engagement is viewed with suspicion...

GCED now occupies a paradoxical space: it is more urgently needed than ever, yet its legitimacy is increasingly contested...

If GCED can embrace complexity, foster resilience and adapt creatively while remaining anchored to its ethical core, it may yet fulfil its transformative promise. In a world increasingly defined by division, the task of nurturing global citizens is not only more urgent but, indeed, more radical than ever before."

https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20250613091538645&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=SDGNL9038

Gregoire Anani The dream of global citizenship, where every person has equal rights, no matter their passport, is a powerful answer to today’s injustices. In theory, it could end the unfairness of birthright privilege, ensuring healthcare, education, and safety for all. But in reality, nations cling to sovereignty, treating borders like walls rather than bridges. The law already hints at this idea (like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights), yet without enforcement, rights remain a lottery of geography. The biggest challenge isn’t the vision, it’s the politics. Who decides these rights? Who pays for them? Powerful states resist sharing power, while others fear losing cultural identity. And yet, climate change, pandemics, and wars prove: our survival is already interconnected. Maybe global citizenship starts small, with shared climate visas, open education, and grassroots solidarity. The law can guide us, but people must demand it. The alternative? A world where your dignity still depends on the dirt you’re born on.

Dear Aftab Haider

The foundation of the United States aligns with the physical Constructal Law in recognizing the innate rights of life. The Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution—also known as negative rights—places ten explicit restrictions on government to protect these inherent rights.

If all nations adopted similar protections, it would be a significant step forward for global liberty. By contrast, provisions such as “healthcare” and “education” for example, fall under man-made rights or privileges, which are granted by governments rather than existing inherently.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356475384_THE_SCIENCE_OF_RIGHTS

Michael T Takac Thank you so very much for your amazing insights- I am obliged.