Several times I drew attention of the RG staff and later of all users of RG that the data on number of reads etc. are often incorrect and wrongly counted. To support this statement I compared the low potential interest on some papers because of their narrow specialization and little known language on one hand, and the outbreaks of reads, even in a country, where any interest on these papers can not be expected. Now I have an striking examlple - 60 reads within several hours of a an article published in Slovak dealing with a striktly Slovakian topic, perhaps still interesting for somebody in Hungary, Moravia or Bohemia as adjacent or near countries. A relatively high number of reads within a short time of the next paper shown in the attached picture is also very suspect.

Similar questions and discussions