Which emission is more likely to occur or will have more intensity then? How can we justify this with selection rules? Any references and comments will be highly appreciated.
Thank you very much for your answers. Actually I was expecting such responses; based on Kasha's rule. I am aware of Kasha's rule. However, I would like to take this discussion further in a material. If two different emissions are seen with single excitation energy, isn't it fair to say they are coming from different sites (from different elements of material)? If this is true, how do we differentiate those if elements are unknown? Do we have some other ways to verify that, based on their properties(of any kind)?
Unfortunately I know very little about purity of the sample. I should look into the constituents for sure. About material, it's alumiosilicates of potassium, sodium, and calcium (~7.7eV band gap). Impurities could be anything.
But whatever be the impurities (and emissions from them), they must be different elements if Kasha's rule to be considered, right?
Mineral is known but elements/constituents (not all) are not known. I'm trying to understand What do two emissions (simultaneously seen) mean in Spectroscopy?
I'm sorry for my delayed response. Due to some reasons, CCD is unable to record the data. We are trying to fix it. Once it's fixed, I will record and get back to you.
For molecular metal complexes, sometimes they can show two emissions corresponding to prompt fluorescence and phosphorescence simultaneously. This is due to the relatively slow intersystem crossing (ISC) from singlet state (S1) to triplet manifold (Tn), so that the radiative decay from S1 to S0 can compete with the non-radiative ISC process. Please see the following papers for some examples:
Article Luminescent Tungsten(VI) Complexes: Photophysics and Applica...