I've researched some papers, most refer to bubble/water dynamic simulation with species concentration variation use VOF method, just one by phase field and only study the surfactants distributed along the interface between bubble and water.
I was forced to study the bubble/water dynamic simulation with species concentration variation distributed in the whole water region without bubble, my tutor is averse to permit me to research it by any methods other than phase field. Any friends would like to give me an explicit answer whether it works or any recommended papers to persuade my tutor?
Very appreciate it!!
Both the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method and the phase field method have their own advantages and are suitable for different applications. The choice between them depends on the specific requirements and objectives of your research.
The VOF method is commonly used for simulating multiphase flows, including bubble/water dynamics. It tracks the interface between different fluid phases by solving the mass conservation equation. The VOF method can accurately capture the detailed behavior of interfaces and is well-suited for studying phenomena such as bubble formation, coalescence, and breakup. It is also often used for modeling the transport of species concentration variations within the fluid phases.
On the other hand, the phase field method represents the interface between different phases as a diffuse region with continuously varying properties. It is a diffuse interface method that uses a mathematical field to describe the transition between phases. The phase field method is particularly suitable for studying problems with complex interfacial dynamics and topological changes. It can capture phenomena like phase separation, coexistence, and merging of phases.
If your research focus is on studying the distribution of species concentration variations in the whole water region without bubbles, the phase field method may be more appropriate. However, it ultimately depends on the specific details and objectives of your research project.
Thanks for your answer. but, sorry, your answer really looks like AI. As of now, no one meet my requirement was found. Do you have any recommendation?
Which method to use depends heavily on the specific objectives of your research project and the particular problem under consideration. I think your tutor is right. Otherwise, he wouldn't be your tutor, but you would be his... Do you plan to establish a facility for conducting experimental studies as well?
Nothing referring to experiment has been scheduled. There is no such device or condition. What's more, which method to use in effect depends on whether other have researched and published. As a graduate I'm not powerful enough to independently apply some method on my project, what I can do is take a page from other papers.
Also my tutor is not major in this scholarly orientation and even, I guess, a paper related to it has not been read, because he is not clear what I'm talking about while group meeting. The phase field method is the priority just on account of the former project which I used phase field to establish.
He is afraid of adventure, a new method means a vague future. But I have read a lot of paper, all the paper simulate bubble/water kinetics referring to concentration variation use the VOF method. Here is my doubt, no one paper using method field not means this method is unfeasible, probably I haven't find it. Consequently, I ask for help here to some expert.
We are not in the same environment, not in the same condition, something may be incredible for you but normal for me.
Anyway thank you for replying my post, but I hope a judge based on academic theory.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Biota
- Eukaryota
- Fungi