Dhruba, my points are: 1) There are distributions of positive univariates in which part of receptors receive nothing. It means that the total distributed mass finished without reaching all population. 2) If you graph the CDF this appears as a section with variable zero at the left of the CDF graph if ordered in ascense, or at the right extreme if ordered in descense. 3) In the descending model I use, it is determined first a SEM called W=ln(L i)/ln(p i) that may be represented as a continuous soft proxy function. So Lorenz curve is L= p^W(p); for 1>= W(p) >= 0, so when W(p)=0, L becomes 1, and there is no more to distribute, so I decided to declare that L value becomes 1 for any W
Dhubra. If we assume that x and y values you give are mean values of 1/5 population intervals, then this may mean that for x mean =1, variable y does not exist, but for the rest it does fine. I will work models for descending ordering of x and y, and try to find the slopes you mention. I will show it here later to discuss the point. Your question is necessary and perhaps it is a frequent situation for researchers. Thanks, emilio
Dhruba, my points are: 1) There are distributions of positive univariates in which part of receptors receive nothing. It means that the total distributed mass finished without reaching all population. 2) If you graph the CDF this appears as a section with variable zero at the left of the CDF graph if ordered in ascense, or at the right extreme if ordered in descense. 3) In the descending model I use, it is determined first a SEM called W=ln(L i)/ln(p i) that may be represented as a continuous soft proxy function. So Lorenz curve is L= p^W(p); for 1>= W(p) >= 0, so when W(p)=0, L becomes 1, and there is no more to distribute, so I decided to declare that L value becomes 1 for any W