Hi,
I have several doubts about one paper (Systematic Literature Review) that was rejected. The main topic is Single-Board Computers in engineering education during the period 2010-2020. The editors mentioned the problem with the significance, but the paper was not evaluated by any reviewer. I received a rejection in only two days. Without the feedback of the reviewers, I cannot know the problems with my paper. Editors recommend me a Journal but I don't know if I should present my work in it. My questions are: What can I do with my paper? What is your advice as researchers?, What do you deal with frustration in these cases?
Thank you.
I would suggest you ask a colleague (with methodological and topical expertise in the area your paper covers) to read through the paper and discuss whether or not it is publishable in its current form.
Benefit from feedback received from the current journal, apply modification required or ask an expert/senior colleague to review/proofread your paper, and submit to a new journal.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Media
- Journalism