The interpretations depends on all aspects either positive nor negative.simply advantages and disadvantages .

Salameh Barhoom How to interpret negative total and direct effects and positive indirect effect? @

You need to apply a Chi square test to compare the effects :)

Interpreting the results of a mediation analysis involves understanding the roles of different variables in the relationship between an independent variable and a dependent variable. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to interpret these results:

1. **Identify the Variables**:

- **Independent Variable (X)**: The predictor or cause.

- **Dependent Variable (Y)**: The outcome or effect.

- **Mediator Variable (M)**: The variable that is hypothesized to mediate the relationship between X and Y.

2. **Check the Path Coefficients**:

- **Path a (from X to M)**: This coefficient indicates whether the independent variable significantly predicts the mediator.

- **Path b (from M to Y, controlling for X)**: This shows whether the mediator affects the dependent variable, controlling for the independent variable.

- **Path c' (direct effect from X to Y, controlling for M)**: The direct effect of X on Y when M is included in the model.

- **Path c (total effect of X on Y without M)**: The total effect of X on Y without considering the mediator. This path is not always explicitly shown in mediation outputs but can be crucial for comparison.

3. **Statistical Significance**:

- Check if the paths (a, b, c, and c') are statistically significant. Typically, this involves looking at p-values or confidence intervals. A p-value less than a significance level (commonly 0.05) indicates statistical significance.

4. **Mediation Effects**:

- **Full Mediation**: If path c' is not significant (and paths a and b are significant), it suggests that M fully mediates the relationship between X and Y. The effect of X on Y is entirely through M.

- **Partial Mediation**: If path c' remains significant (but weaker than path c), and paths a and b are significant, it indicates that M partially mediates the relationship. Both direct and indirect paths influence Y.

- **No Mediation**: If either path a or b is not significant, it suggests no mediation. M does not mediate the relationship between X and Y.

5. **Effect Size**:

- Often, mediation analysis will include an effect size for the indirect effect (path a multiplied by path b). This can be presented as a point estimate and a confidence interval. The significance of this indirect effect is key to establishing mediation.

6. **Reporting Results**:

- When reporting results, clearly state the significance and size of the paths, specify whether the mediation is full or partial, and discuss the implications of these findings in the context of the broader research.

7. **Sensitivity Analysis**:

- Consider conducting sensitivity analyses to check the robustness of the mediation effect. This can include testing different model specifications or using bootstrapping methods to get more reliable confidence intervals for indirect effects.

Mediation analysis can provide powerful insights into how and why certain effects occur, but it requires careful interpretation and a clear understanding of the underlying assumptions, such as the absence of unmeasured confounding factors that might affect the relationships among X, M, and Y.

Check here https://stats4edu.com/services/structural-equation-modeling/