My thesis-partner and I examine context level and individual level predictors effect on populist right-wing voting (i.e., Danish People's Party in Denmark) applying a multilevel logistic regression model with three levels (individuals nested in municipality-elections nested in municipalities). We use a pooled sample encompassing five elections (2001, 2005, 2007, 2011, 2015).

We follow the approach of Fairbrother (2014), separating the context effects into a cross-sectional and a longitudinal component, so change is measured at the upper-level. In this model, we were not able to estimate cross-level interactions - possibly due to low between-cluster variance (our model did not converge).

However, applying a multilevel linear regression model by substituting the binary dependent variable with a scale variable (from 0 - 10, with 0 indicating no sympathy for the party and 10 indicating sympathy for the party), we were able to include two cross-level interactions and an accompanying random slope of educational attainment (this is a robustness check).

Our question is how to interpret the results?

We interact the individual level variable educational attainment (six point scale), with the longitudinal component of the context variable, unemployment rate. The included variables are grand-mean centered.

We find that the conditional slope of the individual level predictor, educational attainment, to be significant at p

More Mathias Holst Nicolaisen's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions