Hello,

I applied exploratory factor analysis with network analysis to data from healthy and diseased patients. The analysis shows different clusters of parameters; some are similar in both groups, and some groups cluster differently. For instance, the parameters IleValLeu are similarly clustered in both groups whereas the parameters Pro Ala are not (see figure).

How shall I interpret the data? For instance, in the Pro/Ala case, I expected to see some differences between the groups, but they look pretty much the same to me.

Is the differences about correlation? The scatterplot of the data shows slightly different regression models, but not something compelling.

Is it the value itself? But again there is no real difference in the value distribution between the two groups.

So, what is the actual outcome of the network analysis?

Thank you

More Luigi Marongiu's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions