Hi,

I am currently working on a project where we examine the effect of an intervention on fatigue. The project has been carried out according to an one-group pre-test post-test design. I am uncertain about the best way to conduct a mediation analysis.

In our project we started with a 12week control period. So we have a baseline measurement at T0, and the pre-test measurement at T12. So we have two measurements for 1 condition. The following 12 weeks are the intervention period, and we have post-test measurement after these 12 weeks at T24.

Our outcome (fatigue) and potential mediators have been measured at all these three time points. We conducted a mediation analysis according to Montoya & Hayes (2017). However, this analysis only took into account the measurements at T12 and T24. So the baseline measurement is not considered at all. Now we are wondering, is this the correct way of conducting this analysis, or do we also need to include the baseline measurement? We had the following idea's

  • Conduct the analysis with T12 (pre-test) compared toT24 (post-test) as we did.
  • Conduct the analysis with the average of T12 and T0 (pre-test) compared to T24 (post-test).
  • Conduct two separate analyses, so compare T0 and T12, and compare T12 with T24.
  • Conduct an analysis to compare the change score (T12-T0) with the change score (T24-T12)

What would you guys do?

Similar questions and discussions