How to determine friction factor for pipe flow in Ansys fluent?

The reasons may be:

You may have used an incorrect value of the given parameters: the pipe diameter D, pipe length L, fluid density ρ or fluid velocity, in your formula. The pipe diameter should be the hydraulic diameter, which is defined as D = 4A / P, where A is the cross-sectional area of the pipe and P is the wetted perimeter. For a circular pipe, the hydraulic diameter is equal to the inner diameter, but for a non-circular pipe, it may be different

The pipe length should be the actual length of the pipe along the centerline, not the projected length on a horizontal or vertical plane. For a curved or bent pipe, the actual length may be longer than the projected length

The fluid density should be the average density of the fluid between the inlet and outlet of the pipe, not the density at a single point. The fluid density may vary with temperature, pressure, or composition along the pipe

The fluid velocity should be the average velocity of the fluid between the inlet and outlet of the pipe, not the velocity at a single point. The fluid velocity may vary with cross-sectional area, friction, or pressure drop along the pipe

You may have used an incorrect formula for calculating the friction factor for turbulent pipe flow. The formula you used is based on a simplified assumption that the friction factor is only a function of Reynolds number. However, for turbulent flow in rough pipes, the friction factor also depends on the relative roughness of the pipe wall, which is defined as ε / D, where ε is the effective roughness height and D is the hydraulic diameter. A more accurate formula for calculating the friction factor for turbulent flow in rough pipes is the Colebrook–White equation, as shown in the image:

where f is the friction factor, ε / D is the relative roughness, and Re is the Reynolds number. This equation is implicit and must be solved numerically for f.

Kristaq Hazizi

Determining the friction factor for turbulent pipe flow in ANSYS Fluent is typically straightforward, but there may be several reasons why your results do not match the expected values. Here are some suggestions to help you determine the friction factor accurately:

Check Turbulence Model: Ensure that you are using an appropriate turbulence model for your pipe flow simulation. The most commonly used turbulence models for pipe flow are the k-epsilon and the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models. The choice of turbulence model can significantly affect the friction factor results.

Mesh Quality: Make sure that your mesh is of high quality and sufficiently refined near the pipe walls. A coarse or poorly-structured mesh can lead to inaccurate results. Use the y+ value to determine if your mesh is suitable for the chosen turbulence model. For wall functions or low-Reynolds number simulations, y+ values should be within a specific range.

Boundary Conditions: Check that you have applied appropriate boundary conditions, especially at the inlet and outlet of the pipe. Ensure that the velocity and pressure boundary conditions are well-defined and realistic.

Convergence: Verify that your simulation has reached convergence. Insufficient convergence can lead to inaccurate results. Monitor residuals and ensure they have reached a steady state.

Solver Settings: Review the solver settings and numerical schemes used in your simulation. Ensure that you have chosen appropriate schemes for turbulence, pressure-velocity coupling, and discretization. Different schemes can impact the accuracy of your results.

Y+ Value: Ensure that you have computed the y+ value correctly. The y+ value is essential for determining whether to use wall functions or resolve the near-wall region. Use a y+ calculator or a boundary layer resolution approach based on your turbulence model.

Turbulence Intensity and Hydraulic Diameter: Double-check the values for turbulence intensity (TI) and hydraulic diameter (D) used in your calculation. Accurate values are crucial for calculating the friction factor.

Verify Units: Make sure that all units in your simulation are consistent. Check that the units of density, velocity, diameter, and pressure are consistent with each other and with the units expected by the Fluent solver.

Monitor the Boundary Layer: Visualize the near-wall boundary layer in your simulation results. Check if it is adequately resolved, and ensure that the grid spacing near the wall is sufficient.

Compare to Literature Data: Finally, compare your results to well-established experimental or numerical data for turbulent pipe flow. If your results still do not match, it may be necessary to validate your simulation setup and boundary conditions against known benchmark cases.

By carefully reviewing and adjusting these aspects of your simulation, you should be able to determine the friction factor more accurately in ANSYS Fluent and achieve results that match the expected values for turbulent pipe flow.

Which ethical metrics is expected from an academic who is the owner or the creator of the measuring instrument?

Hi my name is syahida. may i know the accurate concentration of lpg gas?? is it 250 ppm consider as dangerous gas in household?

What the reliability method of filling missing time series data?

How to standardize and set parameters in the Puller sutter P-97 to get accepted pipette shape and resistance for whole cell recordings on DRG?

How do I write in a more professional scientific way?

What is the difference between Introduction, Background, Literature Review and Conclusion for writing a Thesis Report?

In the case of SEM (scanning electron microscopy) of Fasciola gigantica, some white spots/substances were found but what are the causes for these?

I want to use a light source having irradiance 100u E. per meter square per second in my research experiment .which type of bulb should i used?

Does "response to item ratio" has any effect on "inter-item correlation"?

What is the most perfect way to convert Latex to Word?

Does the pressure(-600 mmHg) affects pH?

Why can't make aluminum nitride film successfully by use sputter?

Is there any test to determine the cardiovascular risk of patients with obesity? from the perspective of obesity?

Why are the velocities so high in my Boussinesq approximation Fluent simulation?

What is the characteristic length to determine the Reynolds number for the scattered turbulent fluid flow?

Why almost every element would be metallized in sufficiently high pressure and low temperature?

Sutter electrode holder leaking after applying positive pressure. How to fix?

What SPSS analysis should I run with one IV (with two levels) and two DVs?

How much pressure we can reduce at the outlet to avoid Reverse Flow?

Exit velocity of natural gas from pressurized tank?