They are ready to any activities to succeed their work

Very dangerous

I completely agree and we should be prepared and don’t give them the chance to win.

Is this your opinion Lucian Stiopu?

To release dangerous extremists?

And for your society to rehabilitate them knowing full well that they view society's intention to rehabilitate them as a sign of exploitable weakness?

This is unheard of?

Extremists involved in terrorism related activities MUST BE HANDED THE MAXIMUM PENALTY OF DEATH!

They are unfit to live amongst humans since they consider our humanity and our empathy, a sign of weakness, hat they can continuously manipulate and exploit to insidiously Inflict grievous bodily harm, strike terror in our hearts, maim and mindlessly kill us to satisfy their psychopathic bloodlust!

Society's collective security and well being trumps, overrides, and forecloses the liberty of extremist terrorist to undermine and sabotage the lives, security and well being of society.

Death penalty is a solution but not the one that I am in favour of. The question that I have tried to answer in my text from above is about how to deal with extremist offenders that are incarcerated, they must be helped to become better citizens and we must do everything that we can to help them, yes they committed atrocities but we are different, we don’t reply to them using their way of doing things, we don‘t kill them, we try to get them changed. They are “ill”citizens and we as a ”healthy” citizens have the obligation to try cure them. Their illness must be cured, we have responsibilities towards them, killing them isn’t the solution, is just a different way of completing their work... Extremist offenders are the product of sick society, they weren’t born extremist they became, killing them will not change anything but getting them transformed may give us the knowledge and chance to address this problem properly. I personally believe that we have a duty towards this kind of people and the way the we fulfill our duty depends the future of them and ours as well.

Segregating extremists has been consistently found to be counterproductive. Firstly, by grouping like minded peers together, it creates an environment conducive to collective reinforcement of extremist ideology and identity. Secondly, it affords a degree of status to these offenders, both in their self-view and in the eyes of sympathisers. Segregation has the short term objective of security and containment, but does little or nothing after the offender is released. I believe that by dispersing this offender group throughout the mainstream prisoner population, their ability to influence is dilutes. Of course there will be exceptions, highly influential or charismatic terrorist leaders that should be kept away from the general prisoner population. But they would more so be the exception rather than the rule. Dy dispersing, these offenders, they are also denied any degree of status, and longer term initiatives such as rehabilitation can be addressed.

Here are some resources that directly cover your question:

Lord Gardiner (1975). Report of a Committee to Consider, in the Context of Civil Liberties, and Human Rights, Measures to deal with Terrorism in Northern Ireland.

Tinka Veldhuis (2016). Prisoner Radicalization and Terrorism Detention Policy: Institutionalized fear or evidence-based policy making?

Nathan Thompson (2018). Australian Correctional Management Practices for Terrorist Prisoners.

Clarke Jones and Raymund Nerag (2019) Inmate Radicalization and Recruitment in Prisons.

Julia Rushchenko (2019). Terrorist recruitment and prison radicalization: Assessing the UK experiment of 'separation centres'

Philip Birch and Louise Sicard (Eds) (in press). Prisons and Community Corrections: Critical issues and emerging controversies - this covers your question in great detail. it will be available in the coming months.

Hope this helps.

You are trying to make a utopia while overlooking the matter of justice. First, let us understand what justice is. As I see it, justice is the concept that a person gets what he/she deserves. A different view from yours that concentrates on rehabilitation, is the view that penal institutions are the government's way of satisfying its obligation to punish criminals instead of the victim's family doing so. That is the tacit agreement between the victims' loved ones and the government and should not be lost sight of. Therefore, the role of the government is to punish each criminal to a standard that meets the approval of the majority of the population, as determined by a democratic process, and for some crimes that standard may be capital punishment.

Addressing the question of separating extremists, whatever plan is arrived at should not include forgiveness because that betrays the victims and their loved ones.