I want to do a meta-analysis on how plant diversity affects soil carbon storage. For some studies, plant diversity was considered a categorical variable. The authors set plant diversity gradients and many replicates. These results have mean, replicates, and standard error. For other studies, plant diversity was considered a continuous variable. The authors investigated dozens of plots, which had different species richness and soil carbon storage, and no replicates and mean. The results were represented using a scatter diagram plus a regression line. I wonder how I should solve this problem. Should my research only include those studies with replicates, mean and standard error, discarding the latter?

More Xiangdeng Du's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions