I am working on some physiological traits of plant to which its expensive to raise the sample size beyond n=3. so kindly suggest some test which is applicable to test such group(2)
Unless the magnitude of difference between groups/conditions is substantial, any statistical test you might select will have very poor statistical power to determine that the difference is different from zero. That's unfortunately the case with very small N studies.
As you have only two groups, there would be no need for a post hoc test beyond the group comparison test itself.
There are various "exact tests" that might be appropriate to your situation. A specialized software package called StatXact could be helpful. Some of these tests are also available through general purpose statistical software, such as SAS, SPSS, and R. These tests avoid parametric assumptions that are usually not tenable with very small samples. But they are not a magic solution to the need for substantial effect sizes, as rightly pointed out by David Morse .
In addition to traditional t-test that is theoretically not restricted to small samples, you may calculate the relative mean effect size (RMES) that may give you an idea about the "real" difference so may help make a scientific inference. As for RMES, please refer to a preprint, "Exceedance probability analysis: a practical and effective alternative to t-tests" on ResearchGate:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348692325_Exceedance_probability_analysis_a_practical_and_effective_alternative_to_t-tests.