02 February 2019 4 887 Report

Hi, I ran analysis on the concentration of Fatty Acids Methyl Ester (FAME) of freeze-dried fish sample using Shimadzu GC2010Plus and its companion software GC Solution.

I first plotted a 4 points calibration curves using the 37 FAME mix. Then I used the same method to run all my samples. I diluted my FAME sample 5 times so that all detected fatty acids had concentration within the standard curve. Finally, the software reported my after post-processing in parts per million (ppm).

Naturally, I multiplied the results reported with a factor of 5 to obtain the concentration before dilution, but here are my questions:

Q1: Are those auto-generated concentration I obtained after multiplying with 5 is what I should report directly in my writing, as in the unit of ppm?

Q2: Or should I further express the data from Q1 according to the freeze-dried sample weight (mg) I used for each sample? So I can accurately reflect the actual FAME concentration in per gram of freeze-dried/wet fish samples. If yes, how? If no, why?

Note:

- I am aware of the presence of calculating the sample concentration based on the ratio between Internal Standard and Sample's peak areas. However, my internal standard C19:0 co-eluted with my FAME-Mix C18:3n6.

- The quantitation method I selected in the software is based on "External Standard" method by comparing the retention time and peak area from my calibration curves. I wonder if what the software reported is the same as to manual calculation based on peak areas ration and such...

- To see my sample extraction method, here: Article One-step method for quantitative and qualitative analysis of...

Any helps are much appreciated.

More chee ping Tan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions