In Kantian ethics, the concept of moral responsibility and the concept of moral blame are closely related. According to Immanuel Kant, individuals are morally responsible for their actions if they act out of a sense of duty, rather than out of inclination or personal interest. This means that people are held responsible for the moral quality of their actions and not just the consequences of their actions.

Moral blame, on the other hand, is the negative judgment that is directed towards an individual who has acted against their moral duty. In Kantian ethics, moral blame is not based on the outcomes of an individual's actions, but rather on the intention behind those actions. If an individual acts out of a sense of duty and follows the moral law, they cannot be blamed, even if the outcome of their actions is unfavorable. On the other hand, if an individual acts out of inclination or personal interest, they can be blamed, even if the outcome of their actions is favorable.

In summary, in Kantian ethics, moral responsibility and moral blame are based on the individual's intention and their adherence to the moral law, rather than on the outcomes of their actions.

In Kantian ethics, moral responsibility and moral blame are closely linked to the concept of free will. Kant believed that individuals are morally responsible for their actions because they have the capacity to make free and rational choices. Moral blame is assigned when someone acts immorally and fails to fulfill their duty, and they are held accountable for the consequences of their actions.