11 November 2015 5 7K Report

I want to do fEPSP recordings on the Shaffer-CA1 pathway in vivo in the middle part of hippocampus in rat. I checked the literature and found conflicting results.

For example, in the work of Doyle et al. (J Neurosci, 1996,  vol 16, 418-424) and their later works, the recording electrode was placed closer to the Bregma than the stimulating electrode was (recording electrode: AP -3.0, ML 2.0; stimulating electrode: AP -4, ML 3). 

However, in some other works, e.g., Bliss et al. (J Physiol, 1983, 341, pp617-26), it is the stimulating electrode that is closer to the Bregma  (stimulating: AP -3.4, ML 3.2; recording: -4.4, ML 3.0). Both claimed that they were stimulating and recording the CA3-to-CA1 pathway. How could they had the exact opposite way of placing the stimulating and recording electrodes when both claimed to stimulate & recording the same pathway? These  are just some examples. I found more reports with  conflicting coordinates.

I am wondering if anyone has a clearer answer on that, and can tell me the accurate way to place the electrodes on CA1 pathway in rat hippocampus.

Similar questions and discussions