24 March 2016 2 4K Report

A recent structure at 2.5A was solved by our group. We observed that at the proposed peptide binding site extra densities (after Refmac) are present on 2Fo-Fc (1 sigma, same below), but interestingly not on Fo-Fc (3 sigma, same below) map. We therefore struggle to conclude anything from this. So is it an acceptable practice to build the peptide based on 2Fo-Fc? Also, would it be our data reduction / MR which has gone wrong which makes the two maps so different?

Of note, we deliberately deleted the N- and C-termini residues in our input model for better MR solution. After MR, the termini of the output model also show similar feature: electron densities on 2Fo-Fc but not on Fo-Fc.

More Sam Tang's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions