Social science such as economics and sociology are as important in meeting those challenges as natural science.

Thank you for raising this profound question. The convergence of biotechnology, AI, renewable energy, and social sciences presents unprecedented opportunities to tackle systemic poverty, disease, and hunger through innovative solutions like precision agriculture, predictive healthcare models, and data-driven resource distribution systems. However, successfully implementing these technological solutions requires a holistic approach that addresses underlying socioeconomic inequalities, ensures equitable access to these advancements, and builds sustainable infrastructure while fostering global cooperation and policy reforms to create lasting, systemic change.

Dear Sandeep Jaiswal , I'm thinking in the same lines of the above answers, however maybe pushing them a bit more: I don't think that the natural sciences can on their own solve the problems of poverty, disease and hunger. For example ok, a new nutritious pill may be invented that will make people feel full and thus eliminate the need for food, but would that really only be a solution and not create any other problems (for example more economic inequality because of the wealth derived by the company making and marketing the pill). Or what happens when science, 20 or 30 years down the line, discovers that that miracle pill is actually harmful for health? What we've already 'forgotten' how to grow food by then or done something else with the space designated for growing food? Somehow, the problems you describe feel to me more like 'trans-scientific' problems (I think the reference for science and trans-science is to be found in Weinberg around the 1970s), which appear like prima facie scientific problems but on a closer look, they turn out to be problems that cannot be solved by natural science alone.

Feng Frederic Deng Merlin Balamurugan Haris Shekeris

The eradication of poverty, disease, and hunger is not only a scientific challenge but also a profound moral and spiritual one. To achieve lasting solutions, we must integrate scientific innovation with a fundamental shift in human consciousness toward higher ethics, righteousness, and universal harmony.

At the heart of these solutions lies the need for a transformation of human morals, ethics, and consciousness. Humanity must transcend its current state of decile and ascend to a dimension of eternal bliss, balance, and harmony. When individuals operate from a state of elevated awareness—where actions are driven by love, compassion, and a sense of universal connection—poverty, disease, and hunger will vanish as natural consequences of this shift.

As the saying goes, “Where there is bliss, there is everything; where it is absent, everything is lost.” Bliss and harmony are the ultimate states of existence, and they form the foundation for prosperity, abundance, and wealth at levels humanity has yet to imagine. Science, when guided by these higher principles, becomes not merely a tool but a beacon leading us to a future of unparalleled abundance and unity.

By embracing this holistic vision, we transform not only the physical world but also the inner world of each individual, creating a reality where these three evils dissolve, and humanity flourishes in eternal harmony.

Regards,

Sandeep

That is true. Science provides the foundation, but it is up to humanity to take the next step forward.

By relying on the holistic approach, science will be used to study the problem of hunger in all its dimensions (biological, sociological, economic, philosophical, psychological, etc.): Describe the problem in its entirety, analyze the determinants, and model situations in order to propose appropriate intervention policies. This approach requires involving all stakeholders, from both rich and poor countries, in an integrated system of collaboration between those who have the means to act and those who do not.

Dear Wakenge Wakilongo,

Thank you for your insightful and thoughtful response. I deeply appreciate your emphasis on a holistic approach, which is indeed the cornerstone for addressing complex issues like hunger, poverty, and disease. You eloquently highlight the need to integrate multiple dimensions—biological, sociological, economic, philosophical, and psychological—into the scientific inquiry, and I wholeheartedly agree.

Your vision of involving all stakeholders across socioeconomic divides resonates profoundly with my own perspective. The idea of modeling situations to identify determinants and formulate effective intervention policies is not only practical but indispensable in tackling such deeply rooted issues. Collaboration between resource-rich and resource-deficient regions, as you suggest, creates a symbiotic system where humanity can thrive collectively.

To build on your point, I’d like to underscore that science must now extend beyond even this holistic framework by incorporating what I term the "science beyond science"—a paradigm where modern science meets spirituality and ethics. When science is complemented by a higher consciousness, we not only address hunger but also ignite a transformation in human behaviour. This shift in consciousness will raise the collective moral, ethical, and spiritual fabric of humanity, ensuring sustainable solutions and lasting prosperity for all.

Consider, for instance, advancements in precision agriculture or genetically engineered crops that alleviate biological food scarcity while also respecting cultural and ethical diversity. When integrated with systems of equitable resource distribution and collaboration, these technologies can be a game-changer.

Let us aspire not just to eradicate hunger but to elevate human consciousness to a state where abundance, compassion, and shared prosperity become the norm. I’m confident that by synergizing our ideas, we can pave the way for a brighter future.

Once again, thank you for your valuable contribution to this important discussion. I am eager to continue this enriching dialogue.

Warm regards, Sandeep Jaiswal

I doubt if biotechnology can be the cornerstone for poverty reduction. We should be able to tackle societal and political structures. It is difficult to predict if we will progress in this field.

Therese Stutz Steiger

Therese, addressing the complex issues of poverty, hunger, and disease requires both technological advancements and an elevation of human consciousness. Science provides powerful tools, but without a shift in how we perceive and address the root causes of these challenges, progress will remain incomplete.

Raising Human Consciousness to Solve Root Problems

While scientific innovations tackle symptoms, raising human consciousness directly addresses the root of human suffering. This elevation can be achieved through:

• Awareness of interconnectedness in ecosystems, economies, and human health fosters empathy and responsible action. Comprehensive education systems that integrate ethics, sustainability, and personal growth are transformative.
• Mentors and spiritual guides (gurus) help individuals tap into their inner potential, unlocking pathways to happiness, abundance, and solutions beyond material success. Their teachings can harmonise technological advances with a values-driven approach to progress​.
• Practices like meditation, yoga, and mindfulness empower individuals to transcend stress, negativity, and limitations, allowing them to contribute positively to global challenges.

The fusion of scientific methods with ancient wisdom can lead to unprecedented breakthroughs. For instance:

• Holistic health approaches that combine modern medicine with traditional practices (e.g., Ayurveda, acupuncture) offer comprehensive solutions to disease prevention and treatment.
• Agroecology, informed by indigenous practices, supports sustainable food systems while respecting natural laws.

Happiness, Prosperity, and Abundance for All

Raising human consciousness creates a ripple effect. People guided by higher awareness naturally align with practices that ensure:

• Compassion-driven leadership promotes fair access to food, healthcare, and education.
• When individuals operate from a state of gratitude and abundance, innovation and generosity flourish, replacing cycles of scarcity and greed.
• Elevated consciousness encourages cooperation across nations, sectors, and disciplines, amplifying collective impact.

Transforming society requires a balance between inner evolution and external solutions:

• Naturally bred crops, precision agriculture, clean energy technologies, and universal healthcare systems provide immediate relief​.
• Leaders who prioritise human well-being over short-term gains ensure sustainable development. Such leadership can emerge from a global shift toward mentorship and values-based education.

Conclusion

The eradication of poverty, disease, and hunger is not merely a scientific or political challenge; it is a call for humanity to evolve collectively. By integrating technological advancements with a heightened consciousness, we can address the roots of suffering and unlock a future of happiness, bliss, and abundance for all. This approach represents not just a solution but a paradigm shift that will leave a lasting legacy.

Cheers,

Sandeep

Can AI help to end poverty?

"Quashing poverty requires knowing who is in need and what their needs are, but collecting those data has long been a time-consuming and costly challenge. Some researchers are turning to artificial intelligence (AI) tools to help plug the gaps. AI can be biased, and could miss people without a digital trail. On the other hand, it can analyse a larger, more representative portion of the population than do household surveys, and identify patterns in data that even specialists could miss, says development economist Ariel BenYishay..."

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00565-7

Social science research is a weapon against poverty

"Social science research has a real impact on the reduction of poverty and inequality, two key Sustainable Development Goals – a correlation that underscores the need to bolster research capabilities to generate research-driven, tailored solutions targeting challenges in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).

This was a key message of a study, “Leveraging social science research to combat poverty and inequality in the Middle East – A pathway to achieving SDGs 1 and 10”, published in Cogent Social Sciences on 5 March...

The analysis indicates that an increase in the quantity of research output correlates with a significant decrease in poverty. Significant results are also observed with respect to the quality of research, showing that higher citation counts are associated with even greater reductions in poverty levels.

Similar to poverty, the findings indicate a significant relationship between research output and inequality levels in the Middle Eastern context. The study showed that both the quantity and quality of research outputs are associated with reduced inequality, as expressed by the Gini index...

Atta-ur-Rahman said social science research in MENA was underfunded and underprioritised compared to natural sciences and engineering.

“High-quality and focused social science research has the power to transform societies, inform evidence-based policies, promote social justice, enhance governance, and foster sustainable development. Prioritising social sciences will unlock the MENA region’s full potential and pave the way for a brighter future,” he said..."

https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20250312113808975

Dear Ljubomir Jacić , I think i'll for once disagree with you :)

I feel that the quality of the research rather than the quantity may be more substantial, but also that the correlation above may be quite local and specific to the area under study and not universal, also I suspect that even if the correlation does any real work, then it plateaus after the studied society passes a given level of welfare. Just a thought though :)

Best Wishes,

Haris

Haris Shekeris Ljubomir Jacić Feng Frederic Deng Merlin Balamurugan

Therese Stutz Steiger Wakenge Wakilongo

Thanks for the good discussions on this topic so far and hope for more contribution from you and other members of this wonderful community of ResearchGate and beyond. Below is my final take to this question. Feel free to reply back.

While technological innovation, AI, and social sciences contribute meaningfully to identifying and addressing human suffering, they are not the ultimate solution.

Only Spiritual Science—the science beyond science, the eternal wisdom of the soul and consciousness—can truly and completely eradicate poverty, disease, and hunger. It is the king of all sciences, the origin of all truth, and the only path to total, permanent freedom from human suffering.

The Final Solution: Spiritual Science in Action

Poverty is not merely the absence of wealth—it is the absence of inner alignment.

• Economic poverty reflects external imbalance.
• True poverty is bondage to greed, selfishness, envy, and fear.
• Spiritual Science teaches abundance of being, freeing one from attachment to material accumulation.
• A truly rich being is content, selfless, generous, and free from dependence.

Disease is not just physical—it is a signal of disharmony between body, mind, and soul.

• Physical ailments arise from toxins, stress, or lifestyle—but also from mental agitation, karmic debt, and spiritual ignorance.
• As consciousness ascends, the body purifies, the mind calms, and the being enters a state where disease cannot exist.
• At higher stages of spiritual development, one becomes immune to lower vibrations, including disease.

Hunger is not only for food—it reflects a deeper craving or incompleteness.

• Physical hunger must be honoured—but excessive craving and indulgence arise from imbalance.
• Spiritual Science teaches the art of moderation, contentment, and freedom from compulsions.
• A spiritually awakened being eats to nourish, not to indulge—and in higher states, may transcend bodily needs altogether.

Integration with Other Sciences

• AI, medicine, agriculture, and education are all tools—but only effective when aligned with divine consciousness and ethical truth.
• Social science helps us understand society. Spiritual Science helps us transform it.
• Policy may distribute food, but only spiritual awareness ends inner hunger.

Final Message

All other sciences point outward. Spiritual Science points inward—and upward. It is the only science that teaches not just how to survive, but how to transcend. Only through it can we not just reduce—but completely eliminate poverty, disease, and hunger from the root—now and forever.

Thanks dear Haris Shekeris for your comment. I am very grateful for.

This is an article - study that was mentioned in my comment.

Leveraging social science research to combat poverty and inequality in the Middle East - a pathway to achieving SDGs 1 and 10

Article Leveraging social science research to combat poverty and ine...

Dear Ljubomir Jacić , thanks for the link to the paper, I'll to have a look - though I still owe you an answer to a paper you had flagged at the end of January (I haven't forgotten, it's just I haven't found the time to do it justice :) )

Dear Sandeep Jaiswal , i don't know if you'll answer, given that you gave your 'final message', but I was wondering why Spiritual Science is Science, are there experiments, are there competing theories, are there labs and data one can take in Spiritual Science? I'm afraid i can't think of any, could you help a bit?

Best Wishes,

Haris