Actually, both treatments (acute and chronic ) were applied in the animal study. In addition, we used the same drug for both treatments, but with different doses and frequency. Thus, the both drugs were taken from the same resource with the same expiration date.
I did these treatments to reduce inflammation in animals, but surprisingly, I observed similar results for both acute and chronic doses. Now, I am interested in knowing how it happened.
Let us see if we agree on definition of terms "acute" and "chronic":
1. acute vs. chronic
1.1 An "acute injury" happens at one point in time, treated soon thereafter, and not allowed to continue into a chronic state.
1.2 However, if the acute treatment is ineffective, the acute injury continues over time and develops into a "chronic condition".
1.3 A treatment to be effective must show "at least some partial improvement". However, a partial treatment may "lose efficacy"and go back to the original state as if no treatment was ever applied.
Thanks for your comment. Actually, before starting the main study, a pilot study has been done. Based on this, dose and time responses already done and optimum dose and time was determined.