Dear ResearchGate Community,
I am currently engaged in a thesis project involving the analysis of essential oils using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), PerkinElmer, Clarus 690. Specifically, I am examining tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) essential oil, which is expected to contain terpinene-4-ol as its main constituent.
My challenge lies in the identification process, particularly when utilizing the NIST library for peak identification. Despite following standard protocols and procedures, I consistently encounter very low probabilities for matches, even for well-known compounds like terpinene-4-ol. These low probabilities persist across all unknown peaks, making it difficult to confidently identify compounds present in the essential oil samples.
Attached to this inquiry are screenshots illustrating the methodology employed, chromatograms, spectrograms, and the peak identification results from the NIST library.
I am reaching out to the community for insights, suggestions, or potential solutions to address this issue. Any advice on improving the accuracy and reliability of peak identification in GC-MS analysis of essential oils would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Best regards,
Achwek Meftehi
PhD Student Neurosciences and Biochemistry
Faculty of Sciences, Tunis