No string of my thought or personal clue is provided. Feel free to share your views and thoughts.
This is an important question with many possible answers.
A phenomenologist such as Edmund Husserl
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/husserl/
or an
ontologist such as Martin Buber
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/buber/
might answer this question by suggesting that instead of instumentalizing everything around us, we could benefit from a gentle approach to living forms (e.g., wildlife) and non-living forms (e.g., water and air) of the physical world. By gentle approach to the physical world, I mean an approach that is non-violent as well as non-destructive.
Let's start by limiting the waste in the sense of taking from the "nature" only the strict necessity. Give way to resilient resources to rebuild. Increase the exploitation of renewable energy. Limiting population growth by limiting births.
Humanities are influence by the planets so to say planets play an important part where humanity join with the nature.It is a fact that humanities cannot ignore planets as all the 7 major planets have its influence all humanity both in the positive & negative traits .
With this humanities cannot afford to close their eyes on the nature as nature is Omni present & quite often planets & nature go hand in hand .
Human beings have to understand the influence of planets & nature initially as an observed but with the influence they have to take a right course of action so as to receive favorable environment both of planets & nature.
This is my personal opinion
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Ecology