The p values you have reported are less than .05 so that would indicate your results are significant.  Depending on the publishing conventions of your field you would report these values as either p = .0004 or p

Thanks Cassie, but I m still doubtful. I know these values are far less than my set value I.e 0.05 as statistically significant but I just read if values are that much small and v close to zero there is may be  problem in data accuracy or may be sample size is not correct. I used spearman correlation coefficient method. May be there is some other suitable analysis that I can apply for double chack?Being molecular biologist I don't have good knowledge of stats that y I posted here. I wish my supervisor has sane opinion as you ;) and yup I add > by mistake