I am preparing gold nanoparticles on Nitrocellulose in order to perform some tests (the tests themselves are unfortunately private so I can not share those details). In preparation for the tests, I am depositing gold nanoparticles (20nm) on to different nitrocellulose brands. One is an unbacked nitrocellulose from cytiva, the other is a high flow brand (backed). On our end, we are not blocking or spraying test lines, simply pipeting the particles on to the nitrocellulos (it is a requirement of the next test(s) to be done). The high-flow gave a nice red color when the nanoparticles were deposited. They sat in the fridge ”drying” for 1-2 days and remained red. When done again with a new section of the same nitrocelluose sheet, they turned a dull purple over the same dry time and conditions.

The prep was redone on the cytiva unbacked nitrocellulos. this also went from red to purple. The outlier seems to be the initial High flow test (red remains red) and the other successive preps seem to be the expected outcome. I am more curious which is the “usable” material and which has possibly gone bad.

could they be getting less red as more of the nitrocellulose absorbs and “binds” to the gold? If the initial prep was red and remained red, does that indicate that the particles did not bind? In all three preps, I took a control sample and pipetted it with PBS to ensure the particles did not disperse from the initial location (indicating some loose or unbound particles). Withou an SEM, visially, it seems that all three stayed localized to the initial pipet location (no drifting or unbinding as far as I can tell).

TLDR: the gold particles are going from a nice bright red to a dull purple when pipetted to nitrocllulose, it this supposed to happen?

Similar questions and discussions