GENERAL DISCUSSION : ALL can keep "playing a game" AS their lives, but that will NOT work; our absolute BEST PROBABLY WILL NOT work (in my view) -- for survival of the species, the ultimate criteria. What does doing our best look like? : https://www.researchgate.net/post/With_Climate_Change_and_all_I_will_tell_you_what_I_think_the_minimum_needed_for_survival_is
[ I am childless. I have absolutely NO PERSONAL REASON TO CARE ABOUT YOU -- I guess it is, in good part, for "sound logic"'s sake -- we can DO with that IFF [ (two "f"s are not a typo) ] we actually DO with THAT. Be an animal, forget any and all religion. (I am, by the way, a Theravada Buddhist -- an atheist, believing IN NO supernatural at all ; we have enough to do with the natural, the actual actual. We very much must be concerned with, as-much(and well)-as-possible, educating ourselF (as much as we can)(all of us, doing this) . BUT, do it in a NO-SELF WAY (to have no clutter) in YOUR [own] way, i.e. to not falsely "connect" to YOU (your own "self") in any way not necessary (or, if you must, (as you may have to) : temporarily) (AND expel any processing where you are BELIEVING something, via essentially NOTHING or nothing clear) Don't be clingy; and verify ALL YOU CAN, for yourselF (and others), and thereby come to something closer to reality [(as much as we can)], reality (or realities, if you like [(but now all at one time)]) as it really is -- this is a WAY (i.e. cross-contexts), it does not come automatically. But, it is as simple as it need be. Good luck. (For a bit more guidance, see https://mynichecomp.com .) I have NOT BEEN PAID AT ALL for half a life (the latter (later?) half ); there is really no reason not to trust me, unless you're very confused and/or [must] see me as insane.. I have no vested interest(s) (in any conventional sense) AT ALL (we all do have some interests).
Your 'discussion' is psychotic and irrational. It's not even correct English grammar
Andrew Paul McKenzie Pegman , (You surely think you've got ME pegged, I guessing, PEGMAN.)
ALL you say is NOT TRUE.
Well, everyone has an opinion (many WAY too much opinion without good of sufficient thought) -- perhaps your mind is warped (often a good guess); thanks for nothing (why did you feel you had to "participate"??????? (act. vent misdirected hostility (or more "pure" hostility ???)). Perhaps you should stick to your seeds . A Western man that can not fathom a no-self view (what a surprise, NOT), not even good for YOUR SELF .
At least I offer something (YOU DID NOT, because you, in no way, explained your view, and thus it was unintelligible -- like the majority of "folks" here : lazy and irresponsible. Other replies should actually say something other than "they hate me".
I should report you to your University for an extremely inappropriate response (if I only had time -- oh, wait, I DO) . Have yourself a good [whatever] "life" (gamed-life).
Perhaps you could explain how your view is good FOR ANYTHING (except maybe for your hostile professors or your fellow PILED-higher-&-deepers (Jeepers Peepers !). It is simply name-calling, like a 3 year. old. (And, your advanced degree is in ... ?)
Here is how I think it maybe went : in your 2 milliseconds of READING & EVALUATING (most time on the latter ---> THEN your got irritated ---> THEN you got inappropriately HOSTILE (if THAT is the way it went : YOU ARE IRRATIONAL).. It's "folks" like you we don't need here on RG (to put it most mildly) : actually you are just (ONLY) destructive. Perhaps you would like to come and beat me up ? (You would not be the first.) How can you have a higher degree and still act like a THUG? (A good question for ALL to ask.)
( It is the case that a lot of Australians come from criminal stock AND psychopathology is highly inheritable . )
As is not atypical [ of me ], I edited for an hour ; I have gone 24 hr. editing, but I think I have handled this,
- Badges
- Science topic