For Newton, the force of gravity was merely a function of masses and the distance between them. Maxwell unified electric and magnetic fields into a symmetric coherent set of equations known as Maxwell's equations. For Einstein, gravity was caused by a deformation of space-time continuum. On this basis, he developed a highly complex algebra that merely describes it geometrically. Nowadays the majority of studies explain only the effects of gravity and not its nature. The unification of gravity with electricity has been a challenge for many great physicists of the last century. Einstein dedicated almost 25 years to the problem without success, while, in 1968, Dirac suggested that it would not be possible to unify the fundamental forces.

Was Dirac right? There isn't a unified force in nature? We know many physicists had been working hard to find a unified field theory. Also, they predicated many interesting theories. In this field hardest efforts had belonged to String Theory. After long year’s research and thought, I have understood any effort for finding a unified theory without considering conversion of the force and energy does not have any considerable success. In fact there is a unified force/particle in nature. In other words, Force and Energy are convertible. Also according to Relativity, mass and energy are equivalent. So, Force, Energy and Mass are three manifests of a unified entity. And it leads us to change our perception about force, energy and mass.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280626794_Unified_Force_Energy_and_Mass?ev=prf_pub

Article Unified Force, Energy and Mass

Dear Dr. Hossein Javadi,

Thank you very much for your kindly cited my work here.

Best wishes.

Yin

In theory, the energy a photon is determined with E=hw. Therefore, as the frequency (w) is varied in gravitational redshift, its energy is accordingly varied. In experiment, the Pound–Rebka experiment showed that, a photon that cannot excite an atom can excite one as the energy of this photon is varied in the gravitational redshift.

Dear Yin

I appreciate your support to this issue. I agree with you on Pound–Rebka experiment. Also your attention to changing gravitational potential energy, is interesting and hopeful for me that shows our thoughts are close together. It show I am not alone in this case.

With total energy conserved locally the blue shifting of a photon should weaken the gravity potential, but not by much, and only briefly. Then the photon either  escapes or is captured, which in either case means the gravity is restored.

In another thread with light entering a black hole, the prevailing opinion was that the mass of the BH would increase. If not then the temperature of the BH should increase, but this in not a popular thought.

Dear Jerry

I agree with you, in my opinion without unified force, mass and energy we can not describe conservation energy law well. See my last comment.

Dear Hossein Javadi!

Thank you for your question…

Your question is not accurate! We do not know about the source of gravitational field (the macroscopic level or microscopic level) which are influenced by light…

My response:

The process has importance only in quantum level!

Example in case of Earth gravity … The Sun light has no important effect… Only in one case we can count with it… in time of reach the surface of Earth (in the contact place will produce two type micro influence (outside increase of gravity field, inside decrease of gravity field) (quantum level)…

Best Regards.

LAH

Dear László

I appreciate your attention on this topic. I generally I agree with you. In my opinion, to understand the source of gravitational field, we should to describe the mechanism exchanging graviton between bodies.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310457967_The_Mechanism_of_Graviton_Exchange_between_Bodies_Part_II?ev=prf_pub

Article The Mechanism of Graviton Exchange between Bodies, Part II

Dear László，

The effect of Sun light on the gravity is very little. But, it does not mean there is not such an effect.

 Dear Zhu, You have right, only quantum level:

"Only in one case we can count with it… in time of reach the surface of Earth (in the contact place will produce two type micro influence (outside increase of gravity field, inside decrease of gravity field) (quantum level)"

Dear Hossein actually I did not have English translation of:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277364319_Tenyekkel_igazolhato_a_gravitacio_valos_oka

Perhaps I will have it in 2-3 mounths… I gave up with current science interpretation I have written 3 articles in Hungarian, but I am not ready with them because in clothes selling is a hard period… Only Planet erosion exists in English:

http://planeterosion.blogspot.hu/ In this article is not written that the asteroids of inner asteroid belt could formed only in rocky planet surface condition! I had had discussion with Thomas Van Flandern… His theory of Exploded Planet has common features, (but the mechanism is very extremely process):

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/esp_sumer_annunaki23.htm

My work in Hungarian present here in RG permit those processes which are behind planet-erosion… I have lot of original ideas but without possibility of their verification…

Best Regards.

P.S. I have a post form a friend. It sending depend from if I find it…

Article Tényekkel igazolható a gravitáció valós oka

Dear László

Thank you for respond, I hope see it later.

i dont think so as the gravitation remains same on the surface and varies as we move top and bottom

Please read   http://milesmathis.com/pound.html  to realie he errors of that experiment.

The gravitational fields can bend the  Space time  around the  mass  so  ... it just change the direction of light , but no effect to electromagnetic fields 

Gravitational "Blue and Red shift" show that gravitational fields effect to electromagnetic fields, 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308890409_Photon-Graviton_Interaction_and_CPH_Theory?ev=prf_pub

Article Photon-Graviton Interaction and CPH Theory

Dear Hossein

he source of gravity in general relativity is an object called the stress-energy tensor, which includes energy density, momentum density, energy flux, momentum flux (which includes shear stress and pressure) etc. Obviously, light has energy, so it acts gravitationally in GR. Since E=mc2E=mc2, we see that mass contributes an enormous amount of energy - so, massive objects have very strong gravitational fields, so that the other terms are negligible, which is why Newton's law works so well. However, they are there - so, light does have a gravitational field, even though it has zero mass.

Best regards 

Dear Saeed 

Thank you for interesting comment. According to GR you are right. But we need a new approach on gravity. 

Nice theories but no facts to prove it. Why not look at experimental facts where a laminar light beam does increase weight of any object placed over it and decrease weight for objects placed under it. Any good gravity theory have to be able to explain that simply.See paper  (Further Experiments Demonstrating the Effect of Light on Gravitation

Louis Rancourt & Philip J. Tattersall)

Louis

Dear Louis

Thank you for your suggestion, please give me the link of paper.

Hi

The paper is here

http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/apr/article/view/48836/26720

Louis

Thank you for link.