There are a few stance to this.
1. Thats a technical problem mostly, not a physical limitation.
(One can start with the assumptions that is possible, derive some results and then see how the Big picture leads to the resolution of initial problem.
2. Its not technical since if the mathematics fail, physics fails too the 2 cannot be separated.
3. Its a conformist's view. Established science says it is true and people stick to the established viewpoints in fear of tracing a new path.
Which one do you endorse?
A main argument pro the absolute thesis is the strong evidence of non 180 degrees in triangles of light days near black holes that makes curved spacetime not "just a model" and the issue of compatibility of quantum states with curved spacetime a very real one.
Βedides, quantum cosmology is an existent field, although a main brabch of it, holography remains an unsettled field of research with optimistic proponents nevertheless i.e relating the entropy of holographic surface at the horixon distance might provide an explanation for dark energy
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medical Science Nursing
- Dissertations