One of the most important issues in the AI field is the alignment of AI goals with human goals.The analysis made in my paper showed that human rights may be considered a guide in European regulations related to AI. Both the AI Act and the Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law are examples of third-generation human rights regulation acts. This means that the human-centric approach adopted in the context of activities within the AI lifecycle is not just a slogan. However, some studies have indicated that regulations may slow down the development of AI in Europe. There is also a question regarding the relationship between European regulations and those of other regions of the world. In particular, the provisions of the Convention clearly show the aspiration that human rights will be a factor in the alignment of goals between AI and humans worldwide.
Do you think that it is worth considering Human Rights as a guide in the process of the Alignment of AI goals with Human goals?
yes , I read your paper . from a cs background , now in some AI , BY image to image or text to video conversions , you can generate some inappropriate or nsfw image of any person , you can also make any deepfake video to defame others , can use AI voices to defame some personalities , even some generators(text to img) can also make pedophilic images as well, even AI promoted plagairism and violating programming code licences also a possible case , and it is possible to leak some personal or private company , military or dangerous drug or weapon or crime forensics material info or govt related information in those interfaces accidentally . You will need strict law to govern all this !@Kamil Strzępek
Dear Sayantan Roy
Thank you for taking your time to read my paper. I appreciate your comment.
Best regards.
- Badges
- Science topic