Dear fellow roboticist,
Many now agree that robotics is set to be the next major technological revolution. A robot can be defined as a cyber-physical system that can automate traditional and nontraditional tasks of humans in an automated manner. Adding new capabilities is increasingly important for the robotics domain, but security aspects are rapidly gaining relevance with the advent of industry 4.0 and IoT.
Security should not be mistaken with safety. Safety is about preventing the robot harming the environment where it operates, whereas security is about preventing the environment from harming the robot. With the aim of better understanding the current concerns in robot cybersecurity, a number of industrial and academic partners have created the Robot Security Survey. The questionnaire will be used to produce research material and all results will be completely anonymized.
Thank you for participating!
To participate, use the link below:
https://robotsecsurvey.typeform.com/to/u5r44R
Sure. Safety and security are two main disturbulances in application of robots and future IORT(Internet of robots things ). My
Chinese book included some contents about Safety and security of IoTs. And for the invatation from World Scientific Press, I plan to translate my book to English. If someone can give me a hand, I will share some contents with him. Thanks
Yes i care about robot security and safety!. Stop killer robots ;)
You talk about: "Safety is about preventing the robot harming the environment where it operates, whereas security is about preventing the environment from harming the robot." My opinion is that security is not only preventing the environment from harming the robot. Security is about information/computer security (lets say it is about the virtual domain, inside-out and outside-in) and safety is about the physical domain (also both inside-out and outside-in).
Good read (about standards of Robotics/IoT): https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/good-practices-for-security-of-iot
Yes, I completely agree!
In the below a few sentences extracted from one of my last works concerning robot "security" - "International Journal of Social Robotics
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00581-4
TROS: Protecting Humanoids ROS from Privileged Attackers
G. Mazzeo, M. Staffa"
Hi all,
Happy to see a good discussion above. For those interested in the safety and security intersection in robotics I reccomend reading through an article we released some time ago. Preprint Robot hazards: from safety to security
. Ron Mélotte , I completely share your view that security is over a physical and cyberdomain, whereas safety is genuinely concerned about physical aspects.For more information about standardization Zeashan H. Khan , I can add one of the first standardization efforts put forward in RSF v1.0: Preprint Introducing the Robot Security Framework (RSF), a standardiz...
I share my article in conference ., is the last name of it in AITA2017. Safety and Security in chinese is a same word"安全". So lots of us cannot make it clear. Your paper is great to define their different. I need the conclusion of your questionnaire ,maybe in form of table or figures or published articles， to support my research. I
will keep it security, untill you publish your work, and cite it in my book clearly. Thanks.Maybe we have some cooperation tomorrow
Doing cybersec Industrial Control System (including self-driven vehicles) for last 7 years I can state, that Mission Centric Approach in combination with industrial safety methods (such as Failure Mode Effect Analysis) works perfectly for any cyber-physical system.
Book Cyber Resilience of Railway Signaling Systems
, page 9- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Statistics
- Survey