Hello Mr. Mahesh Kumar ,

i agreed. but both the male and female contributed for birth of new men or new women.

Thanks Hidouri Khaoula & R.D.Vignesh devendiran for your replies

Useful part of woman.

Women are wonderful. Give her a smile and will give you her heart. Give her a ring and she will give you a family . Give her a sperm and will give you a baby. Give her a house and she will give you a home........ But don't give her hard time; you will never know what she will give you back ☺

Thanks Dmytro Leshchenko & Zin Eddine Dadach for the nice replies

Agreed that “men are a part of women” since women is playing major role to giving the birth.

Thanks G. Singh, Dr Q. Faryadi, and S. Sivaruban for your replies.

Thanks again

It is difficult to think that in life because each one ( man or woman ) has different characteristics and behavior when comparing between them, yes all from women.

Thanks@ Saad Kariem Shather for your reply

Women should be given kudos for their God assigned duties for child bearing. Applause for the good women worldwide. However, we can't go contrary to the word of God that woman was created from just a bone from man's rib.

Thanks@ Segun Michael Abegunde for your reply

I too agree with @Segun Michael Abegunde that the first creation was man and woman was created out of his rib.

“O humanity, fear your Lord Who created you from one soul, and created from it its mate…” [4:1] The Quran.

After that she bore children who gave rise to different lineages and generation came so we are all brothers and sisters born from the same great grandparents.

Sorry to disagree with you that mother creates, she only bears the foetus.

There is only one CREATOR who decides which sperm should fuse with which egg to give the best Result(zygote) in perfect shape and form.

Functionality if you see the man carries the sperm for 2 months(formation, maturation and storage) then 10 lunar months in mother’s womb so a total of 12 months. This is the reason in China when the baby is born, they call the first birthday or in other words you will be one year older in China.

both are essential, except mariam/issa and adam cases

Better it can be said that-

Offsprings are carried and so considered by the mother like her body part.

Thanks.

yes of course , women is the creator....but also without men nothing can be created...so both men and women together creats a new life...

Mothers have been given a high status and their position in the family has been elevated.

Each one complete other. Two opposite faces of one coin.

True. Men are indeed made out of women

Of course not, the women is a part of a man, Allah create Adam first and create Eva from his body.

Man and woman are completing one each other, everyone have possibilities created by God specialized to him, so, they are both reason for creating themselves by them. Women tend to heart, but men tend to mind according to their roles in life, each one is needed to other to complete the life pleasure.

Best regards

Man and woman are completing one each other, everyone have possibilities created by God specialized to him, so, they are both reason for creating themselves by them. Women tend to heart, but men tend to mind according to their roles in life, each one is needed to other to complete the life pleasure.

Best regards

Dear Dr. Mahesh

Yes, the genetic aspect of men consist of half a father and half mother and thus men are part of the mother .

Best regards.

it's the opposite dear friend. Women are a part of men.

Our father Adam was created first and from his body was created our mother.

Hello Mr Kumar I would like to comment as a Student of Science and Medicine also before me the People knowledge and Beliefs. Some Scholars do not touch some of the topics who they do not know or they do know it very well. It may cause difference of opinions among people so the matter called "Sensitive". Sensitive issues or discussions where people can give different opinions according to their Knowledge are acceptable. Your Question is like "Egg comes first or the Chicken" I do not accept any one answer that egg comes first as far my Knowledge tells me it was chicken who was saved from Destruction but which one comes first?. Only Almighty knows but as far as My knowlege tells me It was Man who was created first and the women was created from the nearest part of the Heart which was Rib. No question about it that Mother/Sister/Wife is the most Beautiful and Respectful Relation one can have and Experience. Mother love to her child is enormous and uncontable but Father Love and Protection do count as Uncountaable too. I do not see any problem in the Question as men is the part of the women or It was actually women who was part nearest to Heart of men. The Oldest Answer I can find in books is Actually It was Man who was created first and the women was created from the nearest part of the Heart of the Men which was Rib. People might do not believe on my answer but I am sure it is the case.

Regards

Every women has a man and vise versa (i am not touching the physical side but i touch on the behavioral side)

Thanks dear RG colleagues for sharing your views and replies.

According to the Prophet Mohamed (PBUH): "The key of Paradise is under the feet of mothers". So please : Take care of your mother a thousand times.

Thanks Zin Eddine Dadach for the nice reply

Does anyone truly still believe that women were created from Adam's rib? Oh, dear. Besides which of course there are two different versions in the same book, both taken from elsewhere.

The women I know are independent, lively, intelligent and capable. They run businesses, countries, and, when I'm lucky, me.

"Part of" isn't quite the right relationship, but men are "derived from" women in the sense that the fetus will develop along female lines unless certain hormones kick in at a certain stage of fetal development. However, before the hormones kick in, the fetus has already developed some female characteristics. That's why men have nipples.

Thanks @ Karl Pfeifer for the reply

Some times they accuse each other, but they can't live without support of each other. Its the creation of nature.

Men and women are the two sides of the same coin in the art of creation. They play a complementary role and neither of them can reach the state of perfection without the aid of the other.

I see it vice versa, the man is part of the woman; die XX/XY-Stragegy of human nature means: mercifully allows the woman man to participate in the X chromosome. Man has no chance to human reproduction in vivo.

Thanks Hom Nath Chalise , Pankaj Tomar , Reza Biria , and Hein Retter for your replies and views.

Thanks again

I agree with the marvellous detailed answer presented by Ahsan Siddiqui that ALLAH almighty has ceated Adam first then Eve. This opinion coincides with one sayings of Prophet Mohammed of Islam that Eve was created from the rib which is nearest to Adam's heart. This reflects the strong bond between Adam and Eve that shows they are complementary to each other. It has been observed that this issue of who was created first is controversial among the current discussions of RG researchers. But the most important thing is that there is a mutual strong bond holding between man and woman for life.

I fully agree with Dr. Waleed Abobatta answer

Man and woman are completing one each other, everyone have possibilities created by God specialized to him, so, they are both reason for creating themselves by them. Women tend to heart, but men tend to mind according to their roles in life, each one is needed to other to complete the life pleasure.

Best regards

Man is both male and female (Gen 1:27).

Ovum=2 female chromosomes=xx.

Sperm=female and male chromosomes=xy.

The x chromosome is the foundational momentum for a woman to appear; this was G-d's work!

Torah and science correspond, but we have always to understand the temporal momentum of creation and creatures.

Yes. So says the holy bible. Women make men complete in all ramifications. Women also complement men in many ways.

Lord Shiva Hindu God known as ARTHANARESWARA. (Lord Shiva + Parvathi+ Gangs on Head ). I think my explanation is sufficient.

Lord Shiva Hindu God known as ARTHANARESWARA. (Lord Shiva + Parvathi+ Gangs on Head ). I think my explanation is sufficient.

I think it is true that the woman supports motherhood not only from the moment of birth, which she does throughout her life.

The man cannot come to feel what a woman feels throughout her pregnancy.I also think that a greater commitment of man in the experience of birth and upbringing is necessary. we still have to advance in those topics of commitment with the reproductive process, as we have already been some countries like Sweden for example.

They both play a vital part in "Art of Life" and none of them can exist without the other.

My view is that you have to approach the question in a scientific manner. All men are, in the beginning stages of their evolution, female. It is additional hormonal activities that give rise to gender related differences much later in human growth. What exactly is a female anyway? What is a male? Fundamental questions need definitions. In reality, there is simply, in my personal opinion, no difference between the genders, since there is a single species. As such, on the question itself, the process of reproduction is a joint task, albeit the female variety undertakes more responsibilities obviously, however, there is a joint custody over the outcome of such unions. But this phenomenon is also visible in the animal kingdom, the female variety simply has to do more, for some biological reasons currently unknown. Is it evolutionary drive? Is it natural selection? Random chance? So, this needs exploration I guess.

The question, had it been phrased as say: children are part of women, then, perhaps, then I might hinge towards your proposition given the fact that kids do turn out like their mothers/nurturers, in my opinion. Female of our species might not always adopt a role of a nurturer, mind you. Snakes abandon their eggs, what would you call that?

I think you ought to look wider in your assessment of things, men are not part of women, women are not made out of ribs of men, rather human beings are outcomes of ecological chemical reactions. There is no 'superior' or 'inferior' anywhere, what is just is. If you need an element to produce another element, both are necessary. However if one element contributes more to a process, then that element simply has to do more and, perhaps, that is down to the patriarchal nature of our society. Should women just refuse that role, what can the male variety do? Someways that women have been given a definition of what they ought to do is, at times, rather unfair, at least in my personal opinion.

Not to mention, it's how things evolve, we consume and impose ourselves on other beings for our own gratification. Vegetarians consume and harvest plant life, meat eaters do so with lesser animals, employers do so with their employees (essentially, we help multiply collective social material wealth) and men do so with women, who are, as widely understood in Science, physiologically (lack of hormones leads to lack of muscle growth) not capable of challenging the patriarchal nature of social constructs, whether they are found at home or outside. Whilst this is a highly contestable statement, as there are women figures who have steered large bodies of human capital towards a certain trajectory, perhaps this lower status, if I can call it that, has been a legacy byproduct of our pre-industrial states, where aggression was part of our overall wellbring. Hormonal activities lead to aggression - this is a scientific fact. We would resort to violence to attain property, as rather unfortunately, in the past, women and children have indeed been classified as property to be won or lost (in the Indian context of course, perhaps in the larger Asian context too, but that is not for me to discuss).

It's just evolution playing out - you are able to abuse for gratification, then you keep doing that. You keep abusing because there is no counter reaction. For men, since I am a man, you look up to sections of such people (like your mothers and sisters) and, if you truly understand, feel guilty at the mindlessly imbalanced nature of their existence, in my opinion females, especially in rural environments in Indian societies (not sure of other communities, but I am sure this is applicable there) are facing deplorable conditions.

If in a holy city like Varanasi can house scores of elderly women abandoned by their offspring, this says something out loud. Is someone listening? I mean can these guys not even be able to afford last rites of their mothers? How do you expect them to treat other women in general? I have no real confidence over their abilities as human beings.

In my view, if living beings can abuse, they will abuse. If they can consume, they will consume. If we feel guilty because we have some intimate level of visibility, then we reform. But I have met folks who have an exact opposite view of women (wrong and bad ideas). Likewise, I have met women who have never given birth, or managed a family, or worked or contributed to society in any way or form (not that this is their defined role, they can be anything they want, in my personal view because they are human beings, equal in every way and form to anything that exists), who have this added sense of pride because someone else, say like my own mother, has just bore that much more burden of bearing that heavy role of a nurturer.

So technically, blanket approach is not ideal. For men, the 'better educated' ones at least, things have to be more holistic. Your idea is a response, this is a response, a guilty response we ought to avoid.

But as I have a more wider approach to things, to me, it is a scientific question - in my view, you are what you want to be, you work towards what you want to be. I am sure, if there is enough dynamism in the efforts of the Indian feminist movement, they would not need men (like us), showing them gratitude (something that we should show to people who have actually inundated us with something of value, like our mothers) or pity. Women really don't need men to uplift them, if we just control sections of men who abuse, then we'd be in a much better position. So an inward assessment is more of a necessary frame of affairs, if you ask me, in my personal opinion.

Aggression is a result of hormonal activities - men can regulate this process through better self control and restraint. Women can learn more and carve out that rightful place that should have been theirs a long time ago. So, either way, if men just control themselves, things should get way better for everyone (and the world in general, since we control most, if not all, critical decision making positions).

Women are, in reality, just like men they don't need pity... they can stand on their own feet and create a space for themselves. We, as men, should steer clear of such sentiments but should definitely create a culture of meritocracy and stop this downtrodding of half of humankind for purposes, which I sincerely do not understand (because I do not understand why women are looked down upon, to be honest) as I have never been in such a position.

Goddess, harlot or whatever, I don't think women need that kind of terms and acronyms, they need space in a proper context of the term (hinging towards social sciences). This is my personal opinion.

Hope this helps.

Educating a man is educating a person. Educating a woman is educating a nation.

Thanks Zin Eddine Dadach for the nice reply.

yes, he is not dispense for her in many parts of life such house, work...

Yes, it is true but in reality both are meant for each other (man and woman).

I agree with that: men are a part of women and women are a part of men.

Both are equally important.

I think both are distinct but complementary to each other.

I thank a lot for this point of view because I find in it, and for the first time, fairness for women ... Indeed, the woman is the basis, and there are many old stories that tell the story of couples quarreling and go to judges and wise men to judge who takes the children ... When the judge is Wise, his opinion is similar to this view, that the mother carried the child with the pain of the pregnancy and its burdens, and gave birth to him with all the mother and fatigue of childbirth, while the father is the opposite ... So I thank a lot for this opinion and agree with it a lot, the woman is the mother, and the mother is the first school from which the child takes everything he needs, not only care and tenderness, but rather upbringing and morals ... A God has given a woman very great energy and affection through which she can exercise her role as a mother, a man does not have such energy. For me, I always believe that behind every great man is a woman, but unfortunately behind every woman’s failure is a man ... With great regret. My sincere gratitude to everyone.