at large scale, do earth goes around sun or particles of the earth goes around the particles of the sun?
i am proposing new theory which says; the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them.....
Preprint THEORY OF MOST PROBABLE DISTANCE
my dear unique scholars welcome to your valuable feedback, answers, comments....
thank you
@ Juan Weisz
my dear Juan Weisz why can't we take most probable distance?
Dear Shs,
It has been proven out of any doubt that the gravitational interaction between the Earth an the Sun varies as a function of the inverse square of the exact straight line distance between them.
@André Michaud
My dear André Michaud ya it is true locally Newtonian limit in general relativity is valid but at large enough scale inverse square law may be used according to the rules of quantum mechanics....therefore in inverse square law I am taking most probable distance...
hi Shs,
would you please give me an instance of the method of the inverse square law and one of your proposal?
Thanks a lot,
Angelo
@ Angelo Cei
My dear Angelo Cei, I have given in a link total document....
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322755034_THEORY_OF_MOST_PROBABLE_DISTANCE
Dear s h s hussainsha,
Without having read your paper in great detail, I agree with you: each particle emits a particle-like gravity-information (we can call it 'graviton') and this interacts with each particle at a distance.
The process I found for this action is the Coriolis force, which results in an attraction. The annexed paper explains this, among other issues.
Article Is the Differential Rotation of the Sun Caused by a Coriolis...
By the way, I would suggest you to consider Gravitomagnetism instead of the Schwarzschild's metric in order to get interesting results in gravity....
while G depends on mass, R, it should be described as a functional (s. unification of relativity & quantum without using strings- my work is published here on RG)
dear Botan, that`s exactly what I said (too). but to generalize: G(R,m) should be expressed as a functional. case doing so, some advantages were: operating with derivatives or integrals (of the functional) one gets more informations about G!
@ Botan Jawdat Abdullah
My dear Botan Jawdat Abdullah is there any objection if we use most probable distance? If you have elaborate me in a layman words so that I can understand because I am a learner.
@ Botan Jawdat Abdullah
my dear Botan Jawdat Abdullah thank you very much ...... i am very lucky having person like you...
but i don't know why you are giving irrelevant answers....
proof:
i asked a question to you;
is there any objection if we use most probable distance? and i did not asked a question is there any text book objecting of using most probable distance?
if i found answer in " A Student's Guide to the Mathematics of Astronomy "
why i ask a question to a great scholar, Botan Jawdat Abdullah by wasting my valuable time?
as you are a great scholar will you please don't give irrelevant answers by misreading English!!!!!! use logic... the logic is if we found some where in textbooks or in Google no need to ask questions in RG.
Probably you are thinking in the context of path integral method and by the most probable distance you mean the average of the all trajectories or distances between two objects. In conventional quantum mechanics these approaches are justified using uncertainty principle. But, i think looking for an underlying theory which uncertainty principle and non-commutative structures can be explained is more interesting.
@ Faramarz Rahmani
my dear Faramarz Rahmani , i am applying uncertainty principle of Quantum mechanics to large scale structure of the universe to overcome the problem of Dark matter and quantizing gravity....
Preprint THEORY OF MOST PROBABLE DISTANCE
Conventional quantum mechanics is not universal. It is not an objective and ontological theory. There is a sharp distinction between quantum world and classical world due to the process of observation, reduction, collapse and ... in conventional quantum mechanics. In Bohmian quantum mechanics the situation is somehow better than CQM. But its classical limit also is non objective and it has its special problems. I believe that the current quantum theory can not solve the problem of dark matter and dark energy because it is a instrumental theory not an ontological theory.
@ Faramarz Rahmani
my dear Faramarz Rahman i am proposing new approach in this approach, i am applying uncertainty principle of Quantum mechanics to large scale structure of the universe to overcome the problem of Dark matter and quantizing gravity....
Preprint THEORY OF MOST PROBABLE DISTANCE
the answers you are giving every one knows about that....so be precise in giving answer
the proposal as follows
Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
answer: i am proposing yes.....
do you have any scientific flaw in a answer after reading preprint only you comment or answer....
thank you...
@ Botan Jawdat Abdullah
my dear Botan Jawdat Abdullah ,
do yo know discrete nature of electromagnetic field energy levels is different from discrete nature electromagnetic wave?
energy levels are discrete not in the sense of particle but discrete on 'n' value, a integer.....where as discrete nature of EM wave is in the sense of discrete packets which is a particle.....
in a similar discrete nature of Gravitational field means; energy levels are discrete not in the sense of particle but discrete on 'n' value, a integer.....
thank you.................be positive.............
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Elementary Particle Physics
- Particle