Shaw, Sylvia. 2006. Governed by the rules? The female voice in Parliamentary debates. In Baxter, J (ed) Speaking Out: The Female Voice in Public Contexts. Palgrave: Basingstoke. pp81-102.
Shaw, Sylvia. 2000. Language, gender and floor apportionment in debates. In Discourse and Society. Vol 11 3 pp401-418.
Walsh, Clare. 2001. Gender and Discourse. Longman: Harlow
Brend, R. 1975. Male-female intonation patterns in American English. In Thorne, B., Henley, N. (eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. MA: Newbury House, 84-87.
Cole, J., Thomas, E., Britt, E., Coggshall, E. (2008). Gender and ethnicity in intonation: A case study of North Carolina English. Ms. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and North Carolina State University.
Eckert, P., McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, T.R. (2004). Language and Woman’s Place. (Bucholtz, M. (ed.), Revised and Expanded Edition).Oxford: Oxford University Press, 39, 78-81
Hasegawa, Yoko; Hata, Kazue. (1994) Non-physiological differences between male and female speech. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on the processing of spoken language 2, 1179-1182.
Jiang, Hongliu. (2011). Gender Differences in English Intonation. Proceedings ICPhS XVII. Hong Kong, 17-21 August 2011.
McConnell-Ginet, S. (1978). Intonation in a man’s world. Journal of Women in Culture and Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago 3(3), 541-559.
Xia, Xiufang. (2013). Gender Differences in Using Language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, No. 8, pp. 1485-1489,
The following paper won't directly answer your question, but it shows underlying principles of gender difference in prosody. Note, however, actual voice strategies used will depend on the demand of the situation.
Xu, Y., Lee, A., Wu, W.-L., Liu, X. and Birkholz, P. (2013). Human vocal attractiveness as signaled by body size projection PLoS ONE 8(4): e62397.
Male & Female educators are reaching a greater number of learners by providing a variety of teaching strategies in the curriculum. Gardner describes seven intelligence: linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, musical, Bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, and interapersonal. Mastery style represents the ability to use language to describe events and sequence activities; the Interpersonal style, the ability to use language to build trust and rapport; the Understanding style, the ability to develop logical arguments and use rhetoric; and the Self-expressive style, the ability to use metaphoric and expressive language.