Dear Scientists, I have uploaded the preprint of my manuscript on the velocity of light, showing an argument different from Special Relativity theory. A proposal to go beyond Bing Bang theory was also described there. I would greatly appreciate a critical review comments on it. It can be found in ResearchGate "Preprint Interpretation on the Velocity of Light
".Thank you very much.
Best Regards, Chan Bock Lee
The interpretation you've presented offers an intriguing departure from traditional views on the velocity of light and its implications for our understanding of the universe. By suggesting that the velocity and direction of light can be influenced by the motion of its source or observers, you challenge some of the fundamental tenets of Special Relativity. This could potentially open up new avenues for exploring the nature of light and its behavior in different contexts.
Your proposal to consider additional factors such as light refraction, gravity, and other effects in explaining the redshift of light from distant sources adds depth to our understanding of cosmology. By expanding the scope beyond the Doppler effect alone, you invite a more comprehensive examination of the processes at play in the universe's evolution.
However, it's important to thoroughly evaluate the evidence and implications of these interpretations. While your ideas offer fresh perspectives, they should be rigorously tested against experimental data and subjected to peer review to ensure their validity. Additionally, clarifying the specific mechanisms by which these proposed effects operate could enhance the clarity and coherence of your argument.
Overall, your exploration of these concepts presents an intriguing challenge to established theories and holds promise for advancing our understanding of the cosmos. Further refinement and scrutiny will be crucial in determining the validity and significance of these ideas within the scientific community.
Dear Kalim, Thank you very much for the comments and the suggestions. I agree with you that the argument and the proposal need to be tested with experimental data with peer review by the scientific community, which I wish.
Dear Professor Lee,
Your observations appear to agree with there being no "Relativity of Simultaneity" cf. below -- to my mind, light's rate of progress and resulting optical length is governed by the events that must be witnessed to occur by both observers.
Preprint Further Animadversion upon the wiki figure purporting to dem...
Dear Gary, Thank you very much for the comments and the information. Best regards, Chan Bock.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Academic Journals