Yes, you can :-)

Some useful information can be found there:

Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, et al. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):2-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev264.

https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/31/1/2/2379983

Ludwin A, Martins WP, Nastri CO, et al. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):101-109. doi: 10.1002/uog.18923.

https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18923

Fernandez H, Garbin O, Castaigne V, Gervaise A, Levaillant JM. Surgical approach to and reproductive outcome after surgical correction of a T-shaped uterus. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1730-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der056.

Best greetings,

Rafal

Thank you very much!

In Bosa's paper data could be found about the diagnostic criteria of T-shaped uterus, but these measurements seem to be subjective to me:

" the transverse diameter at the isthmus (isthmic; I), the mean depth of the

myometrium up to the serosa (myometrial; M)" - for me it is not clear, where to measure these distances, in which level.

Perhaps you find our hysterectomy research interesting, regardless of the shape of the uterus:

Here on RG are papers about T-shaped uteri:

T-Shaped uterus

• January 2015
• DOI:
• 10.1007/978-1-4471-5146-3_25
• In book: Female Genital Tract Congenital Malformations
• Rose Meier
• Rudi Campo