We are prematurely arriving at Hubble Constant and conclusion of acceleration of expansion in the Universe.
Nothing in Nature lasts for eve and follows DOB and DOD principles. Light propagating forever in Vaccum of Space, while not encountering any matter (though rare), has not been verified and likely to lose momentum to lowest frequency and lowest temperature (temperature and momentum of Photon are related at the time of emission and absorption). The Vaccum of Space itself at the lowest temperature will be the next place, beside the matter, for the photon to be absorbed. The CMB is the epoch just before that moment, and where the temperature is approaching 0 Kelvin.
My recent papers for the last 6 months have explored the different independent lines of thinkings, without wanting to prove the alternate source of Redshift theory, have come to the same surprising conclusion.
The Galaxies can also have retrograde movements like planets, where they are moving away and then moving towards.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-019-0906-9
Dear colleagues,
I have repeatedly come across claims that the Hubble constant is not a constant at all, but, so to speak, a variable. And not because Hubble himself initially overestimated this supposedly constant, but on the merits of this issue. After all, it should be clear to everyone that the size of the universe depends on the evaluation of this constant. So: if we take for Ho = 73, then indeed the size of the universe at z ~ 10 will be somewhere equal to 13.8 bly, but the size will almost triple if we take it at z ~ 10: But = 29.
If anyone is interested, then do the following experiment. Take the interval z = [0, 0.001]: Ho = 73, with z = [> 0.001, 1.109]: H = 41, z = [> 1.109, 2.218]: H = 34, z = [> 2.218, 11]: H = 29. All astronomers, if they really want to, will be able to verify for themselves that Hubble's calculation of the distances to cosmological objects will very well correspond to the distances in the NED database:
https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/classic/. The conclusion is based on ~ 90 objects that I collected in the above redshift ranges. I am convinced that our universe is at least three times larger than the current estimate of 13.8 billion. Here astronomers must surrender, as they, in my opinion, do not want to, and slightly correct the Big Bang theory for a more static development of the universe than this monstrous explosion, which allegedly occurred 13.8 years ago.
Sincerely, Joseph E. Mullat
Red-shift is implicit in the Light Propagation in Vacuum. Light has a birth and death. Death by matter is there and if Photon keeps travelling for long scales, without hitting matter, will eventually get absorbed by Vacuum of Space as CMB. We can generate Photon from Vacuum of Space, and so it must also be able to absorb when the momentum and energy is approaching the 0 Kelvin as CMB.
- Badges
- Science topic