Personal pronouns have long been used as predictors of in-group vs. out/group representations. The sociopragmatic functions of the diectic elements you have addressed are presented in my 2012 article published in journal of pragmatics. I think that article can be quite helpful. Wish you lots of good luck with your nice research.
To Dafnah, thank you. But I don't know if you've observed that Wilson's (1990) categorisation of inclusive and exclusive 'we' is unique and misleading: the former as including the speaker and the latter, as excluding the speaker. However, in pragmatics, simply put, inclusive 'we' includes the addressee while exclusive ';we' excludes the addressee.
However, I'm really wondering if there are fresh/novel thoughts or interpretations, concerning the deployment of deixis in presidential inaugural speeches