Very recently I have published a review titled NUTRITION AND TOXICOGENOMICS. Mind you it is not on nanocellulose but it might explain the observation of your. Below is the reference (it is also available through Researchgate)

Nutrition and Toxicogenomics: A short Review

J Ghosh, R Jog

Nutrition and Food Toxicology 2, 300-304

Honestly added here for readers' information and convenience:

cf. also Karen Ludlow's other question, asked by December 3rd:

can be found @

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_anyone_provide_me_with_evidence_that_nano-cellulose_can_cause_skin_eruptions_to_help_convince_my_GP_that_it_can_be_a_problematic_food_additive?

You're welcome, dear Karen. What I am interested in is the clarification (because Jai Ghosh mentioned "nanocellulose"AS WELL as Pouya Saeedi ) that with ADDITIVE 471 you meant and / or similar

==> 471 Mono- and di-glycerides of fatty acids , as it turns out from the

COMPLETE LIST OF ADDITIVES

(... currently about 350 permitted food additives in Australia/New Zealand. ) which can be found at:

https://fedup.com.au/information/information/complete-lists-of-additives.

Right? or did you mean so called "Thickeners", as:

Thickeners

455 Yeast mannoproteins

460 Cellulose microcrystalline (anti-caking agent)

460 Cellulose, powdered (anti-caking agent)

461 Methyl cellulose

463 Hydroxypropyl cellulose

464 Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose

465 Methyl ethyl cellulose

466 Sodium carboxymethylcellulose

Thank you for elucidation. Best regards and wishes [ today I asked at my pharmacist about all those swallowed capsules (which aren't made from gelatin any more, but from nano-cellulose (HPC & HPMC and others) in conjunction with the addition of Titanium dioxide and other questionable "ingredients" (ingesting nanoparticles perhaps disturbing also enzymatic reactions in human body....not only in the /through the epidermal skin...) there might be a potential risk in the future....)