https://hal.science/hal-04283596

If we mean the reversibility of time in Einstein’s special theory of relativity, then Einstein’s approach to this theory initially contains the reverse negative progression of time. But this is a mistake, because there is no reversal of time in nature. Otherwise, with one frequency or another, we would observe the reverse passage of time in our physical reality, in our lives and in our experiments. The error is caused by the fact that in his very first work in 1905, A. Einstein, when constructing the special theory of relativity, did not take into account the fact that his theory in its certain part theoretically leads to negative time. Yes, he could not take this into account, since he was the first in this theory and could not foresee all its subtle features to which it leads.

This unintentional oversight of A. Einstein can and should be corrected in our time. To do this, it is enough to introduce another postulate into the axiomatics of the special theory of relativity, the postulate of time.

In my works The source of causal paradoxes. Incomplete research by A. Einstein into the possibility of superluminal motion , Causal paradox in Ehrenfest's description , About the impossibility of the movement of superluminal signals into the past of any inertial reference systems , Superluminal signals in the Einstein-Ehrenfest space-time zone , Tolman's anti-telephone paradox and its solution I did this and formulated this postulate as follows:

“Time is objective, homogeneous, unidirectional from the past through the present to the future and irreversible. Material objects and fields cannot fall into the past of any ISO at any speed of their movement in space-time.”

My works published on researchgate.net contain a solution to all the known causal paradoxes that occur in Einstein's interpretation of the special theory of relativity. In addition, I note that in my other works on researchgate.net I eliminate other shortcomings of Einstein's interpretation of this theory. For example, the question of reality or just the apparent appearance of what the Lorentz transformations give to the observer is being resolved. Look trigonometry SRT researchgate 2 .

Go ahead and read. There is a large field of scientific research for all researchers. There is enough work for everyone!

This is of course not a complete answer to the question, but it may be helpful when searching for an answer. See please

Conference Paper ЛОКАЛЬНЫЙ РЕЛЯТИВИСТСКИЙ ИНВЕРТОР ВРЕМЕНИ / Local relativist...

Thanks to my esteemed colleagues.Of course negative time is a big issue but here we have glaring errors that overturn the existing view from Einstein.