Well If I don't mistake Erwin Schrödinger himself worked on developing a unified field theory in the years after his groundbreaking work on quantum mechanics and the wave equation that bears his name. However, his attempts at unification in the 1940s, done in correspondence with Einstein, failed to gain traction. After announcing a result called "Affine Field Theory" in 1947 that was criticized by Einstein as preliminary, Schrödinger gave up his unification efforts.

While some other physicists like Marie-Antoinette Tonnelat and Mendel Sachs worked on unified field theories in the mid-20th century, skepticism from Einstein and others, along with the challenges of uniting quantum mechanics and general relativity, led to progressively fewer scientists focusing on classical unification from the 1930s onward.

The Schrödinger equation remains a cornerstone of quantum mechanics because it has proven incredibly successful at predicting and explaining the behavior of particles at small scales, even if interpretations of what it means about the nature of reality are still debated. There is no evidence that scientists are "brainwashed" into "defending" it - rather, they recognize its continued empirical success.

So the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics, the measurement problem, and how to unify it with gravity remain open questions, claims of a suppressed unified theory are not substantiated. Unification remains an ongoing quest, with theories like string theory and loop quantum gravity representing current approaches, but a fully successful theory has yet to emerge and gain widespread acceptance. Science progresses through evidence and scholarly discourse, not conspiratorial suppression of published theories by "iron guards." Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence I suppose.

The modern theory of quantum mechanics is incomplete.

It is capable of describing the quantum energy field on the microscopic scale via the Schrödinger equation and its derivatives but is not capable of describing the energy field on the macroscopic scale such as the domain of thermal diffusion and sound intensity in audio rooms. . etc.

On the other hand, in previous articles we have shown that the so-called theory of Cairo techniques and its chains of B matrices are more complete.

They can numerically resolve both the macroscopic energy field on the thermodynamic scale, such as the energy field in thermal diffusion PDEs, and the sound energy field of PDEs in audio rooms. . etc.

In a precise and revolutionary way.

Additionally, they are also capable of describing and resolving the quantum energy distribution at the microscopic scale initially described via the Schrödinger equation and its derivatives.

Considering that they can describe and solve pure mathematical problems such as numerical integration and infinite integer series in more detail, we better conclude that the numerical statistical methods of Cairo techniques and its B matrix chains are capable of describing almost all fields with the exception of the gravitational field (of general relativity) which will be the subject of the next article.

Therefore, we propose that the Cairo techniques and their B-matrix chains constitute the required foundations of a unified field theory.

It's logical and it makes sense.

In this paper [1], we present detailed theoretical and numerical studies of six diverse physical and mathematical studies where the numerical results are surprisingly accurate.

In conclusion, B-matrix strings and numerical statistical theory of Cairo techniques provide a framework for a unified energy density field theory.

1-An introductory framework for statistical unified field theory, Researchgate, ILISRT review, May2024.

For a more detailed answer,

Please see: An introductory framework for unified statistical field theory, Researchgate, IJISRT journal, May 2024.

It's unfortunate that a good research was defeated by the old iron guards of the Schrödinger equation.

The good news is that the Schrödinger equation itself was proved wrong with the new modern research in this area. Please refer to the link below for the recent publication about the myths of Schrödinger equation and why is it wrong to use it in the first place?

Article Schrödinger Equation unfit for fundamental law

We are free now to do whatever we want to with the unified theory and many more as slavery is finally abolished for the good of science, humankind and a new age.

Regards,

Sandeep

This is just a brief answer which aims on the one hand to clarify the question and its answer and on the other hand to thank our fellow contributors for their helpful answers.

It is true that extraordinary allegations require extraordinary evidence.

Unlike the Schrödinger equation and its derivatives, B matrix chains and Cairo statistical techniques are capable of numerically solving almost all energy fields [1,2,3,4,5] of quantum physics and from classical physics like the Poisson and Laplace PDE, heat diffusion equation, sound intensity in audio rooms in addition to pure mathematical problems such as differentiation and integration.

We assume that this makes it a unified field theory.

The references:

1-An efficient reformulation of Schrödinger's partial differential equation

Full text available

May 2024, Researchgate, IJISRT journal.

2-Is it time to reformulate the Poisson and Laplace partial differential equations?

Article

Full text available

June 2023, Researchgate, IJISRT journal.

3-A statistical numerical solution for the time-dependent 3D heat diffusion problem without the need for the PD heat equation or its FDM techniques.

Full text available

July 2021, Researchgate, IJISRT journal.

4-Theory and design of audio rooms -A statistical view, Full text available

July 2023, Researchgate, IJISRT journal.

5-Effective unconventional approach to statistical differentiation and statistical integration

Full text available

November 2022, Researchgate, IJISRT journal.