Dear ResearchGate community,
I recently engaged with a compelling video discussing the Maxwell and Faraday's paradox, accessible via the provided link. Within this content, three experimental setups were explored: the Faraday's disk, the Rowland disk, and a rotating conductor. Notably, the video emphasized that neglecting the magnetic moment and angular momentum of electrons could lead to erroneous conclusions when analyzing experiments involving rotating charged conductors.
This observation resonates with my experiences in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). While comprehending concepts such as capacitance poses no challenge—wherein the double layer undergoes charging—I encounter difficulties in reconciling the emergence of inductance. Notably, the mathematical models I've encountered often lack explicit consideration of the magnetic moment of electrons present on the surface of rotating disks within a potentiostat during EIS investigations.
It appears that existing models may overlook the physical phenomena highlighted by the aforementioned experiments, opting instead for alternative explanations regarding the origin of impedance in graphical EIS representations. This discrepancy prompts further exploration into the incorporation of such phenomena within EIS modeling frameworks.
Best regards,
Maxwell and the Faraday's paradox (youtube.com)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FX91ob7TfJ8
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Engineering
- Electrical Engineering
- Electrodes