Human beings are dependent on one another, that is what makes us as a society. But, can complete dependence on someone be always fruitful or it can be catastrophic?
No I don’t think so that Human Dependence on one another is Cataclysmic or Catastrophic. The reason is only Human can help human Machines lacks Emotions so Emotional help is possible by only fellow human beings. Animals can help human beings but they cannot replace human beings.
The Blood Relationships like Mother Father Sister Brother Cousin Neighbour Relatives cannot be replaced by Machines or Pet Animals. In the time Real needs when you’re really Sick or ill or You are really Old only fellow human beings in the form of Nurses Doctors Brother Mother Sister Father Cousins Relatives are helping us. No one could Deny this truth that Human Beings are dependent on other human beings. Regards
In western psychology there are various forms of dependence, some healthy and some not so. As a child, one is dependent upon his/her caregiver for food, safety and protection. As the child grows up, it tries to assert independence, exploring the boundaries and limits, and learns from this process. The dependence and independence in these first two stages are healthy mechanisms. When one becomes an adult, one has now choices. As social creatures, we are interdependent on one another - that is healthy because we need one another as social animals. In the 1990s a term called "codependence" came out in the West, referring to unhealthy dependent relationships that a person develops. This arises because the person does not know their needs and depends solely on another for the needs to be met. This is unhealthy for both parties and results in sapping of energy and stifling of thinking and creativity.
In our society we can’t be unconditionally independent, we need each others’ services to complete necessary tasks. We are born independent but as we grow independence becomes a trend yet not too fruitful, we can’t achieve everything without the help of the other in society. Therefore, I see that dependence is limitless yet limited.
Related human groups come to develop a certain degree of dependence, which is positive from the point of view of maintaining the cohesion of the group and adapting to the rules of social coexistence for survival of the species.
When the societies thus formed become very conservative, they are closed to external influences that could be positive to enrich their experiences, experiences, traditions and special ways of life. If these societies remain rigid, then they have to extinction.
There must always be a harmonic balance between Dependency for group cohesion but a certain freedom of thought to make individual decisions for their own benefit and for dependents in a certain area of experience. For example, the dependence of the young children of the parents while they form, grow, mature and form new families. Also in work groups and educational processes.