01 January 2015 1 5K Report

I have several articles in a publication in my field that is edited but not peer-reviewed (http://surveypractice.org/...Note that their site says they are peer-reviewed, but I know form experience that they are not in the traditional sense. The editors are peers of course, but articles do not receive additional peer review common of academic publication). 

Here are my current CV pub categories

1) Peer-Reviewed Publications

2) Book Chapters

3) Conference Proceedings Papers

4) Book Reviews

5) Other Publications

Right now I have these things under Other Publications because I couldn't think of a better place to put them and didn't want them to be mis-construed as peer-reviewed. But I feel they are hiding here with other things that are not even edited, such as reports and newsletter articles. 

Here are some ideas I've had, but I don't like any of them. 

1) Non-peer-reviewed Publications

2) Publications not Peer-Reviewed

3) Edited, non-Reviewed Publications

Thus far I have opted for not breaking out "other pubs" further b/c the only ones that really matter are peer-reviewed and book chapters. So lumping everything else under "other" seemed fine. But I'm adding 4 more of these Survey Practice articles that are part of a special issue of the journal that I co-edited (note: now I have a "Edited Journal Special Issues" section, but that just has one entry for the entire special issue, not the articles I authored or co-authored.  

Any thoughts or examples would be helpful. I've looked around at others' CVs in my field, but without much help. Some are putting SP articles as "peer-reviewed" but I don't think that's the right thing to do. 

Thanks in advance!

More Matt Jans's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions