I recently came across the term "random coefficient model" in an article under the methodology section. If anyone has a concise definition and explanation for its use, please reply to this thread.
In a standard regression model - the parameter (eg the slope or intercept) is fixed to a single value - in a random coefficient model it is allowed to vary according to a distribution. For example if modelling the relation between attainment score and a pre-score for pupils,the relation could be allowed to vary (ie random) between different schools. In this version the RC model is called a multilevel model- the key difference is that you are modelling variances and not just means ( that is he overall or fixed intercept and slope) as in standard regression model.
and sometimes the estimates can be technically helpful as they are automatically precision-weighted so that (say) school differences based on few pupils will be downweighted in the analysis
In a standard regression model - the parameter (eg the slope or intercept) is fixed to a single value - in a random coefficient model it is allowed to vary according to a distribution. For example if modelling the relation between attainment score and a pre-score for pupils,the relation could be allowed to vary (ie random) between different schools. In this version the RC model is called a multilevel model- the key difference is that you are modelling variances and not just means ( that is he overall or fixed intercept and slope) as in standard regression model.
and sometimes the estimates can be technically helpful as they are automatically precision-weighted so that (say) school differences based on few pupils will be downweighted in the analysis
Hi Stephen, one other thing to consider about random effects models are the application to analysis of variance. In ANOVA, a random effects model is also called a variance components analysis (Type II ANOVA) - because, much like Kelvyn explained above, the analysis of random effects means that you are selecting from some definable population of sources of systematic variability and rather than assessing group means, you are focusing on group variances.
The application of a random effects model is dependent upon the features of the research design. If you cannot justify that you have a fixed-factor (typically manipulated) research design, you would most likely want to apply a random effects model.
There is so much that could be detailed here, I would recommend looking up a good multivariate book like the Tabachnick & Fidell text "Using Multivariate Statistics" for a thorough explanation.
Thank you Kelvyn and Brendan. Your explanations have helped a lot to clarify this question for me. I will definitely read more from the resources you have suggested.
Attached is a link to a short paper with regard to this. I like the way it goes smoothly from equation 1there to eq2 to eq3. (I'm not wild about ignoring heteroscedasticity in the error term in those equations though. However, it does indicate further down that "z" can be used to 'model variance heterogeneity' here.)
Can anyone explain to me what are the differences between the heterogeneous coefficient and random coefficient models?. In Bayesian approach, I found the literature used non-hierarchical model for heterogeneous coefficient (LeSage, 2017) and hierarchical model for the random coefficient model (Koop, 2003). Thank you